The Long Trail is really tough on ultralight backpacks that have a lot of external mesh pockets. I’ve already snagged a few pockets this year on protruding branches and roots, tearing holes in them, that can leak critical gear if they are not promptly mended. To counter this issue, I decided to try find a more streamlined ultralight backpack with fewer external mesh pockets than the ones I currently own.
Much to the amusement of my wife, I purchased my 8th backpack. I decided to try the Golite Pinnacle, a 4500 ci backpack (medium) weighing 25 oz., with the following features:
- Top loading pack with cord lock closure
- Large front pocket with waterproof zipper
- Built-in padded framesheet
- Air mesh shoulder straps with adjustable load lifters, sternum strap and unpadded hip belt
- Hydration ports on both sides of pack
- Two angled side pockets with elastic binding, optimal for watter bottles
- Two side and top compression straps
- Very tough Dyneema 720 denier ripstop nylon
In order to test the Pinnacle, I loaded it up with the gear I’m planning on taking on my next Long Trail section hike, a 4-5 day trek across difficult terrain near the Vermont-Canadian border. With the onset of autumn, I’m expecting to carry a base load of 13 lbs with an additional 10-12 lbs of food, fuel and water.
The first items I loaded were my rain jacket, rain pants and pack cover. I like to keep these handy, so I loaded them in the front pocket where they’ll be easily accessible. Next, I loaded up my water filter and my tarp into the side bottle pockets. These are enclosed with a very fine, tough elastic mesh fabric which looks like it will rebuff snags and drain easily. Finally, I loaded up the rest of my base gear (sleeping bag, sleeping pad, stove, first aid/repair kit, and sleeping clothes), before picking up the pack and working with the harness system and hip belts to adjust them.
I fiddled with the Pinnacle for a while and tried a number of different gear loading strategies, but found that bottom of the pack has a tendency curl outwards away from the bottom of my back (see bottom, 2nd photo), rather than flush with it. Not only is this uncomfortable, but it prevents good load transfer to the hip girdle.
I loaded the same gear into my Gossamer Gear Mariposa Plus and my Six Moon Designs Starlite and discovered something that I’d never realized before before in backpack design. The framesheet system in both of these packs ensures flat alignment between your back and the pack using a hiker-provided foam sleeping pad. A sleeping pad like the Gossamer Gear Nightlight or a Therm-a-rest Z-lite provides far more rigidity than the Pinnacle’s built-in pad because it’s 2-3 times thicker. For loads above 30 lbs, these packs also provide carbon fiber or aluminum stays to provide even more rigidity.
I’m disappointed with the Golite Pinnacle Pack and will be returning it. I’m surprised by this design flaw given the reputation of the Golite Jam 2, and can’t help but wonder if the pack that I received suffers from a manufacturing defect or if it was stored in a way that would change the pad’s curvature.
Needless to say, I’ll be using another one of my packs for my next section hike.
Related posts:
6 users commented in " Golite Pinnacle Backpack "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI used the Golite Pinnacle on The Finger Lakes Trail in New York this summer without any complaints. I place my ¾ length ridge rest pad inside, open it up forming a shell inside the pack, and then pack it like an internal frame pack.
In other words, you over-rode the factory frame sheet (pad) with your own. That’s a little more useless weight than I can mentally tolerate, plus I’ve mostly moved away from rigid or self-inflating pads these days toward the comfort of inflatable pads like the Big Agnes Clearview and Aircore.
I have used the ridge rest for about ten years and and at 9 oz.gets gets job done in the weight and comfort departments. My pad is going to be packed anyway, why not get more bang for the buck?
Makes sense. The useless weight I was referring to was the internal golite pad which I don’t think is doing a very good job, not your choice of sleeping pad. For example, there are other packs out there where you could put your pad in a “pad pocket” to give the pack rigidity, and use the extra pack space you paid for to store more gear or food.
I disagree, I’ve used this pack many times and I like it! There is some useless weight, but I fixed that. I took out the padded frame, and some other useless items, and it works great for me! I use the method of using my sleeping pad to give my backpack a kind of ’structure’ as Earlylite mentioned.
I didn’t realize you could do that with this pack. Bravo. I have an old Golite Trek, actually 2 of them, where you can more easily remove the factory pad. They also have a mesh back pocket which is good for wet gear. Too bad they’re not available anymore.
Leave A Reply