It never ceases to amaze me just how popular Asolo Boots are in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. I’d say that 75% of the 3 season boots that people wear up here are Asolos, evenly split between the leather TPS 520 and the Fugitive GTX, shown above. That from a company, that as far as I can tell, markets purely by word of mouth in the United States.
I own both of these boots and am on my third or fourth pair of leather ones at the moment. I bought the Fugitives and a pair of Asolo Flame GTX boots about midway through the summer because I wanted to try a boot that would be lighter to walk with when wet and that dries faster than leather. Since then, I’ve been systematically breaking in the non-leather boots and evaluating them for future use in boggy terrain or hikes that will require a lot of stream crossings.
So far I’ve found that the non-leather Asolos require about 30 miles of hiking to break in fully. Wearing them to the office and around the house doesn’t count. When they’re broken in, you’ll be able to tighten the uppers enough to lock your heel down in the heel box. Until then, you’ll feel your foot sliding around a bit.
Let me reiterate: it is a myth that the non-leather Asolo boots don’t require a break-in period. They do.
Having tried both the Fugitives and the Flames, it’s worth noting the similarities and differences between the boots, while I describe the Fugitives in more detail.
The Fugitives are slightly heavier boots than the Flames, both in weight and construction. In a 9.5 US, men’s, the Fugitives weigh 26 oz per boot compared to 24 oz for the Flame. Externally, there is very little difference between the boots. They are both made with suede lowers and ballistic nylon uppers, with substantial toe kicks and aluminum shoelace hooks, like you find on mountaineering boots. There is significantly less padding around the top of the boots than in the Asolo all-leather models, but the boots are still perfectly comfortable.
Internally, both boots are Gore-tex lined, which I actually like, because it extends their season in colder months. In summer, they’re warm, but slightly cooler than leather boots, given that I wear two layers of socks when hiking.
The real difference between the boots is in the sole and the last. The Fugitives have a much stiffer feel than the Flames. This is due to the construction of the last and footbed which has several layers bonded together to prevent pronation, supination, and torsion. The Flame’s footbed emphasizes shock absorption not stiffness and has a less complex foot bed architecture. In English, this means the Fugitives are good for multi-day treks and the Flames are a day hiking boot.
Fitwise, the Fugitive is noticeably larger inside than the Flame. It is wider and higher inside, enough so, to fit a Green Superfeet replacement insole. This is impossible in the Flame, which has significantly less vertical space, and you must use the factory insole. This hasn’t proven to be a problem on day hikes, but I will not take the Flame on an multi-day trip for that reason alone. The risk of plantar fasciitis is not worth it.
Regarding the extra width in the Fugitive: this is easy to narrow by tightening the laces when the boot gets broken in, but you need to be patient and complete the break-in period before you conclude that the Fugitive is too wide. On the flip side, if you have very wide feet, the grey/black version of the Fugitive GTX comes in an extra wide size.
The Fugitive also feels a bit longer than the Flame, enough so, that I’ve experienced a lot less toe pain when hitting rocks or hiking down steep downhills than in the Flames. At first, I thought that the toe kick on the Fugitive was larger than the one on the Flames, but they are in fact both the same size.
So to wrap up, if you are shopping for non-leather boots and you have a wide foot, need better support from an 3rd party insole, and plan on multi-day trips, I recommend you try the Asolo Fugitives. If you have a smaller, narrower foot and are looking for a day hiking boot instead of a softer mushier mid, like the Keen Targhee, you should give the Asolo Flames a try. Personally, I look forward to hiking with both of these boots more next year and plan to wear them out.
Disclosure: The author owns this product and purchased it using their own funds.
The following online retailers sell this product:
Most Popular Searches
- ASOLO FUGITIVE GTX
- asolo fugitive
- asolo flame vs fugitive
Nice review, however, I'd challenge you to try a pair (any pair) of Zamberlan boots. I've owned 2 pair of <a href'="http://www.rei.com/brand/Zamberlan" rel="nofollow">Zamberlan, which I've used now for about 15 years total and they are absolutely perfect in every way. Plus they are an Italian brand that actually makes their product in Italy. Nothing against Asolo and their Romanian production, I just prefer authentic products and the tradition that Zamberlan provides.
They look like nice boots. I'll have to check them out at REI on my next visit. Same price ranges as leather Asolos. I actually prefer leather myself.
Excellent review. This site is great!
Just picked up a pair of Asolo Flames, they are so far the best fit for my heal, and feel solid, however my forefoot feels a little squished.. buti think they may break in with time. Im concerned with the article-authors description that they may not be good for multi -day hikes. Yet they are more expensive than the fugitive price.. and supposidly more advanced in technology. I want somethign for hiking, packing once in a while and every day use..
any suggestions?
You can absolutely backpack using the Flames. Heck some people hike in sandals. But for me, I'd want a bigger roomer boot like the fugitive for serious backpacking. However, if your priority is for everyday use, I'd go with the flames. They're more of a utility boot for hiking and kicking around town.
Having hiked a lot with the flames, I can tell you that the toe box will not expand with use, like a leather boot. They will get a little softer, but not larger.
Asolo hiking boots are some of the best, as stated here, by far. They aren't as heavily marketed like you said, but man are they awesome! Great construction and bang for your buck. I've had several pairs for work and play. They're great for both. Some models are a bit pricey, but will definitely last way longer than other brand name boots.
Wow, great review. I have never even heard of Asolo Boots. I live in the chicago area and will now have to go hunting to find some.
I miss the Asolo TPS Highlands. Better soles than either of these.
I wonder how these would compare to the Asolo 95 GTX? I own a pair of the 95 GTX's and found them rather stiff, hot, and uncomfortable. Nor have I been very impressed with the traction of the non vibram soles.
Frankly I prefer a more flexible boot, which I believe provide a surer grip on wet rocks. To that end, lately, I have just been hiking in a pair of waterproof Merrel trail shoes. While they're hot as hell (only good from 30F to 50F), the flexibility and traction are phenomenal. After doing a 10 mile hike in them, my feet still felt OK. Though I did have to stuff some insoles in them cause they were too voluminous for my narrow feet. In contrast, after doing a 10 mile hike in the Asolo 95 GTX (with OEM insoles), my feet were killing me. I probably should (before selling them in frustration) stuff some insoles into the Asolo's…that is if they'll fit.
To Mike K –
The traction on my Fugitives is outstanding…I hike in the Adirondacks on slippery rocks with great results with them. They're stiff, but not too stiff. I do use an insert (Green Superfeet), and have never had a problem with blisters, slippage, wet feet, or any other issues..I love them, and have convinced my wife to get a pair, and she feels the same way.
As for heat, I hike in them almost year round with no issues…from light snow, to mid-summer.
What is the female version of the Asolo Fugitive??
Melanie – my wife has Fugitives too, but they seem to be harder to find lately. She got them at our local EMS…