Home / White Mountains / 4000 Footers / Mt Hancock, North Peak

Mt Hancock, North Peak

Naturegirl at a water Crossing

Climbing Mt. Hancock

Naturegirl and I climbed the Northern Peak of Mt. Hancock (4,420 ft) on Saturday. We had gorgeous weather with highs somewhere near 70 F, despite the fact that it's still early April in the White Mountains.

Trail Conditions

While the weather was good, trail conditions were awful. Snow depth was still about 3 or 4 feet, but the recent heat wave and  heavy rain had turned the trail to slush. I had snowshoes which mitigated this, but Naturegirl didn't, and she had a hard walk, slipping with each step.

Post Holing

Post holing was also a big problem, particularly on the peak. The trail up Hancock has a southern exposure and by the time we made it to the base of the peak (3.6 miles), the snow had gotten very soft. About 200 feet from the summit, dripping with sweat, I post holed about 10 times in the space of a minute, building myself a little pit about 4 x 4 feet deep and wide. I could go down slope no problem, but going forward was not happening, and I was hemmed in on both sides by brush. Somehow I managed to kick steps into the front wall and get out, but for a second, I thought I'd have to turn round.

Spring Water Crossings

Then there were the Hancock's famous water crossings which make this such a notorious climb. To get to the north and southern peaks, you need to hike 3.6 miles to their base, and depending on how you count, cross 5-8 stream crossings along your route (and back again). Despite the warm temperatures, the water was cold yesterday. However, despite all the recent rains and warm temperatures, water levels were fairly low, although they were a few inches higher in the late afternoon on our return.

Both Naturegirl and I brought two pairs of shoes on this hike, one for the crossings and one for the peak. I wore my Roclite 320 trail runners, wool liners, and Rocky Gore-Tex socks for the crossings, which worked great, and a pair of leather boots and strap-on crampons for the peak climb.

South Peak, Hancocks seen from Northern Peak

Orienteering in Winter

After hiking in 3.6 miles to the base of North Hancock, we couldn't find the trail up or the tracks of previous hikers. I whipped out my map, figured out where the trail was supposed to be, and headed in that direction. After a few minutes of post holing in the trees, I found the trail up.

The ascent up North Hancock is very steep, rising 300 meters in 0.7 miles. With the sun beating down on us, we started to climb slowly in the soft snow, carrying full packs and winter gear. The blazing was poor, but I could discern the trail by following some very old and faint tracks, made weeks ago by a solo hiker. The climb took about 50 minutes, I reckon, and the views from the summit were glorious. I took a bunch of photos with a new Polarizing Filter on my Lumix. This one is a keeper.

Trees on North Hancock Summit

View of the Sandwich Range from North Hancock

Yesterday's hike complements the ascent of the South Hancock we did about two months ago. Both the north and south peaks are a great pairing, and I highly recommend that you give this pair a go, regardless of the season.

Total hike distance was 8.6 miles in 9:30 with 2500 feet of elevation.

Most Popular Searches

  • mt hancock
  • hike mt hancock
  • winter hiking on mt hancock

3 comments

  1. Just curious, are you keeping the tube on the LX3 for the polarizing filter all the time, or just putting it on when you need it?

  2. Great questions – one of these days I'll write a long post about the Lx3 – great camera, but not as convenient as a point and shoot. To your point, I am keeping the extender tube and a tiffen uv filter on as protection for the lens and UV suppression at all times. That means that the factory cap won't work, so I am keeping the camera in a think #2 recyclable plastic bag in an external pocket. I screw the polarizing lens into the threads of the uv filter when I want it, but I may try without the UV filter next time because the polarized pictures came out a bit dark.

    I think I've found a 46 mm cap to cover the uv lens on a permanent basis. Waiting for it to arrive in the mail to try. I think I got it at cameralens.com. I've also tried the Ricoh lens adapter mod and found that it didn't work very well. The lumix motor is not strong enough to reliably push open the cap doors.

    Was that too much info – what do you do?

  3. I don't have a UV filter yet, I love the small size of the camera and was wondering how I would handle it if I got a filter. I'd have to carry it differently, it is usually in my pants pocket now. I use the standard lens cap, it doesn't bother me a bit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *