Top Menu

Ultralight Backpacking Stove Guide

Lightweight and ultralight backpackers have a lot of different options available when it comes to picking an ultralight backpacking and camping stove. Here are the pros and cons of using alcohol stoves, canister stoves, solid fuel stoves, wood stoves, and just going stoveless.

Esbit alcohol stove and cap

Classic Trangia alcohol stove and cap

Alcohol Stoves

Alcohol stoves are popular with ultralight backpackers and thru-hikers because they burn denatured alcohol, which is inexpensive and widely available, particularly in small towns that don’t have an outdoor outfitter that  sells more specialized camping stove fuel. For cooking, alcohol stoves are best used for boiling water which is added to dehydrated freezer bag meals or Mountainhouse style camping meals, although some alcohol stoves are available with simmer rings that enable you to cook more complex meals. The downside of using an alcohol stove is that it is very senstive to wind and must be used with a windscreen which can be awkward to pack. Alcohol fuel is also less efficient than most other types of fuel and it takes a relatively long tome to boil two cups of water (7-10 minutes).

The Bottom Line: The fuel for an alcohol stove is inexpensive and easy to find in small towns.

Recommended Alcohol Stoves

Soto Windmaster Canister Stove

Soto Windmaster Canister Stove

Canister Stoves

Canister stoves have two main components, a stove head and a pre-filled pressurized fuel canister that you can buy at many outdoor stores. Some models, like those from Jetboil, also have an integrated pot which is easily packable and burns very efficiently, letting you stretch your fuel on longer hikes. Unlike denatured alcohol, canister stove fuel burns very hot and can quickly bring two cups of water to a boil in 4-5 minutes. Canister stoves also have the ability to simmer a meal by regulating how much fuel is fed to the burner.

Canister stoves are also much less susceptible to wind than alcohol stoves and can often be used without a wind screen because the gas inside them is released under pressure. The downside of using a canister stove is that they can be hard to resupply on long hikes because you can only buy them at outdoor stores that carry fuel canisters like an REI or EMS. The total burn time for a small canister is also about an hour or less, making it a more appropriate cook system for shorter hikes that are 5-6 days in duration or less.

The Bottom Line: Canister stoves cook food quickly, many can simmer meals, and are an excellent option for shorter trips where you don’t have to worry about running out of fuel. 

Recommended Canister Stoves

Esbit Stove and Windscreen

Esbit Solid Fuel Stove and Windscreen

Solid Fuel Tablets and Stoves

Solid fuel tablets were developed in the mid 1930’s to provide soldiers with a smokeless, high energy fuel for heating food rations. The most popular type of solid fuel, called ESBIT, is packaged in 0.5 ounce tablets which burn for 12 minutes and provide enough fuel to boil 16 ounces of water. Solid fuel tables require a very simple stove to use, often with a built-in wind screen to improve fuel efficiency.

Like alcohol, solid fuel is best used for boiling water to rehydrate dried foods, although same stoves provide you with the ability to simmer or even bake with Esbit tablets. The downside of solid fuel tablets is that they can be difficult to resupply in small trail towns and they can leave an oily residue on the bottom of your cook pot.

The Bottom Line: Solid Fuel/Esbit Tablets are best for short trips where you don’t need to resupply or as a rainy day fuel alternative for cooking when you bring a wood stove.

Recommended Solid Fuel Stoves

Solo Woodstove

Solo Wood Stove

Wood Stoves

Wood stoves are great camping stove option if you are camping and hiking in areas that permit wood fires, downed wood is readily available, and the weather is fairly dry. Wood stoves consist of a square or can-like firebox with vents to pull in oxygen. You fill them up with small sticks the thickness of your finger, light them from the bottom or top, and stack a pot on top to boil water or cook a meal. Simmering is made possible by bringing water to a boil and then feeding the flame with just enough wood to keep the water in your pot boiling slightly.

The advantage of using a wood stove is that you don’t need to carry fuel because you can find it all around you. The disadvantage of wood stoves is that it can rain and you need to carry an alternative fuel like Esbit to cook with or eat stoveless meals.

The Bottom Line: Wood stoves are great if you want to minimize the fuel you carry and enjoy having a fire at night, but don’t want the overhead of starting a campfire.

Recommended Wood Stoves

Garbanzo Bean Salad

Garbanzo Bean Salad

Stoveless Cooking

A final minimalist ultralight backpacking cooking solution is to go stoveless by eating foods that don’t need to be cooked or foods that can be rehydrated using cold water. I know a lot of stoveless hikers who simply rehydrate their meals in a plastic peanut butter jar while they hike, replacing the eaten food with a new batch whenever the jar is empty. This is a good solution if you’re hiking someplace with warm, dry weather where there’s little likihood that you’ll get chilled by cold temperatures or wet rain.  In addition to not have to carry a stove or fuel, eating stoveless meals can save a lot of time, enabling you to hike bigger miles during the day or spend more time relaxing in camp.

The Bottom Line: Stoveless cooking eliminates the need to carry a stove or  fuel and gives you more time to hike.

Recommended Stoveless Foods

Written 2013. Updated 2014. 

Most Popular Searches

  • Ultralight Backpacking Stove
  • best backpacking stove
  • ultralight stove

, , , , , , ,

95 Responses to Ultralight Backpacking Stove Guide

  1. Elmer October 10, 2015 at 10:24 am #

    I have a jetboil stove. For me it’s great, easy to use and carry, quick boil time, durability.

  2. Mark Williams December 10, 2015 at 12:25 pm #

    Hey Philip great post here, do you know or have you heard anything about the Vertex esbit stoves?

    • Philip Werner December 12, 2015 at 5:54 pm #

      You do realize that you can use a rock as an esbit stove….

      • Dennis Blanchard December 13, 2015 at 9:36 pm #

        You’re right, Philip. I always carry at least five pounds of rocks in my pack. :>)
        (Sorry, I just couldn’t help myself!)

        • Philip Werner December 13, 2015 at 9:43 pm #

          Mark – sorry to be flip. I looked at the Vertex stove and it is nearly identical to this one from Esbit, which sucks.
          http://www.campsaver.com/pot-stand-folding-stove
          It too has a suspended fuel plate which is almost impossible to position and keep in place. I bought one and I hate it.
          My original point was simply that you can use rocks for esbit as a fuel plate, stove stand, and wind screen if you want to. It’s really that simple. No need to carry all your rocks either (like Dennis – he’s such a ham!)

          • Rick Taylor February 10, 2016 at 4:11 am #

            Philip — I’ve got the folding Esbit stove too. I found the best use for it is to disregard the plate that holds the fuel tablet, and pop a trangia alcohol burner in there instead. It adds some decent protection from the wind, and shaves off a substantial amount of weight and space when compared to the standard trangia kit.

            I haven’t stalked enough of your posts to know whether you’re a fan of the alcohol stoves, but it’s my preferred ultralight option, especially when paired with a recycled soda bottle for carrying extra fuel.

            Hopefully this information will help someone.
            -Cheers!

  3. Peter February 26, 2016 at 1:51 am #

    To say an alcohol stoves takes up to 10 minutes to boil two cups of water is very misleading. With little study and some trial and error, my pop can stove boils .75 liter of cold water in 5 minutes.

  4. Robin February 26, 2016 at 7:49 am #

    Someone may have noted this in the comments to your excellent post, but the Ti-Tri Caldera Cones, while pricy, are three-fuel stoves, providing great stability, wind and rain protection, and and option to “adjust” heat in its wood-burning mode.

  5. Sspoonless May 9, 2016 at 11:26 pm #

    I did the burn test thing with an EverNew titanium AND a Trangia brass, using denatured alcohol fuel and 6 cups tap water.

    Timed each for min boil time (per cup water) AND max simmer time. The EverNew has a high heat with pot suspended ABOVE, and low heat with pot directly ON. The Trangia has a high heat without simmer ring, and low heat with simmer ring closed down to about 6mm (0.25 inch).

    With either burner, figure the cold pot itself similar to “1 cup of cold” needing heat in addition to the real liquid contained, and figure 6ml (0.2 oz) needed to bring each “cup” nearly to boil – for example 1 pot + 2 cups water = 3 virtual cups.

    Discovered the EverNew high heat burns 6ml in just over 1 minute, and the Trangia high heat takes about twice as long. At a full fuel load on lowest heat, 60ml in the EverNew will simmer for 30 minutes, 90ml fuel in the Trangia will simmer for 90+ minutes.

    So the best alcohol burner with the most options is a set of BOTH. The EverNew low heat is useless in company with the Trangia with simmer ring, and the Trangia without simmer ring is useless in company with the EverNew suspended.

    I can use the EverNew, suspended, to nearly boil 1 pot with 2 cups water in about 3 minutes using 18ml fuel when it burns out. I can use the Trangia with simmer ring open at 6mm to simmer for 90+ minutes. Once the Trangia burns out, I can quickly refuel another 90ml and simmer for another 90+ minutes, and so on. A roast or stew recipe that needs to simmer for 4 hours needs another 60ml to simmer until the 4th hour mark.

  6. Norman May 17, 2016 at 6:12 am #

    Awesome guide. I have been searching for these tips. Keep up the great work. Love your blog.

  7. tekkster May 29, 2016 at 12:33 pm #

    Great page on backpacking stoves. Thanks for all the info. Comments were also great.

Leave a Reply