Ageism and Its Impact on Hikers Over 60
The outdoor industry often celebrates adventure as a pursuit for all ages, yet for hikers over 60, ageism remains a persistent barrier—one that is rarely acknowledged but deeply felt. While the benefits of hiking into older age are well documented, negative stereotypes, underrepresentation, and institutional barriers continue to shape the experience of seniors in the outdoor world. These challenges not only affect personal confidence and participation but also influence how the industry designs gear, markets experiences, and cultivates community.
How Ageism Manifests in the Outdoor Industry
Stereotypes and Social Attitudes
One of the most visible forms of ageism is the stereotype that people over 60 are less capable, less adventurous, or simply less interested in outdoor pursuits. These perceptions can lead to subtle or overt exclusion from hiking groups and outdoor clubs, as well as a lack of encouragement for older adults to try new activities or push their limits.
Research into ageism in climbing—a sport closely related to hiking in its culture—shows that older participants are often underestimated or ignored, even when they have decades of experience and skill. As GearJunkie reports, older climbers (and by extension, hikers) “don’t see themselves reflected in the media, nor do they get the same level of support from brands” (GearJunkie, 2023). This underrepresentation can reinforce the idea that the outdoors is a “young person’s game,” discouraging seniors from taking part or sharing their stories.
Representation in Media and Marketing
Outdoor magazines, social media feeds, and brand advertisements overwhelmingly feature young faces. While there are exceptions—such as viral stories about record-breaking “super seniors”—the average hiker over 60 rarely sees themselves reflected in mainstream outdoor media. Outside Online highlights this issue, noting that “the outdoor industry’s obsession with youth ignores an entire generation of passionate, experienced adventurers” (Outside Online, 2018).
The lack of positive representation has real consequences. It sends a message to older adults—and to everyone else—that their participation is unusual or even unwelcome. For researchers and advocates seeking to promote inclusivity in the outdoors, this gap is both a cultural and a practical challenge.
Gear and Equipment: Designed for Youth?
Ageism isn’t just social; it’s built into the products outdoor companies design and sell. Many hiking boots, backpacks, and trekking poles are created with younger bodies in mind, prioritizing speed, weight, and aesthetics over comfort or adaptability.
Older hikers often have specific needs: lighter packs to reduce joint stress, ergonomic grips for arthritic hands, shoes with additional support and cushioning. Yet these features are rarely highlighted in mainstream gear reviews or marketing materials. As the Appalachian Mountain Club reports, many older hikers end up modifying their gear themselves or relying on word-of-mouth advice to find equipment that works for them (AMC Outdoors, 2021). This lack of attention from the industry can make hiking more difficult, or even unsafe, for older adults.
Group Dynamics and Inclusion on the Trail
Even when experienced older hikers join group hikes or outdoor clubs, they may feel unwelcome or overlooked. Group leaders sometimes assume they need extra help or should stick to easier routes, regardless of their actual fitness or experience. Others worry about “slowing down” younger participants or being treated as burdensome.
These dynamics can lead to self-exclusion: older hikers may stop joining group events or avoid trying new trails altogether. According to a literature review by The New York Academy of Medicine, social exclusion and invisibility are common themes among older adults in recreational settings—leading to reduced participation and increased isolation (NYAM Literature Review, 2016, see pp. 39-40).
Some hiking clubs and organizations are working to combat this trend by offering multiple pace options, no-drop hikes, and explicit encouragement for older members. But these efforts remain the exception rather than the rule.
Physical Realities vs. Social Barriers
It’s important to acknowledge that physical aging brings real changes—such as loss of muscle mass (which accelerates after age 60), greater risk of injury from falls, and slower recovery times (AMC Outdoors, 2021). However, these physiological changes do not mean that seniors cannot enjoy hiking or other outdoor activities; rather, they may approach them differently, prioritizing endurance, technique, and self-care. Many older adults report that maintaining positive attitudes and adapting to change are key to continued success on the trail.
The Health Benefits of Hiking for Older Adults
Far from being risky or inadvisable, hiking can be one of the best activities for seniors. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends regular aerobic activity such as walking or hiking for adults over 65, noting that it improves heart health, strengthens muscles and bones, maintains independence, and reduces feelings of depression.
Aging advocates note that community hiking groups can also help combat loneliness, a significant risk factor for poor health among seniors (Silver Century Foundation). The opportunity to connect with nature and peers may be especially important for individuals entering retirement or navigating life transitions.
Economic Impact
Older adults are a growing demographic with significant spending power. According to Nielsen research, Americans over 50 control nearly 70% of disposable income in the United States. By not catering to this market segment, the outdoor industry is missing out on potential revenue streams, from travel and gear to guided experiences.
Ageism in Outdoor Employment and Leadership
The outdoor industry’s focus on youth extends beyond marketing—it affects hiring practices as well. Older guides, trip leaders, and instructors often face discrimination when applying for jobs or volunteer positions. As Outside Online reports:
“Age discrimination is rampant in outdoor employment… fewer programs recruit or retain guides over 50 despite their experience.”
(Outside Online, 2018)
This lack of representation at leadership levels perpetuates stereotypes and deprives younger hikers of valuable mentorship.
Moving Toward Inclusion
Tackling ageism requires cultural change at every level:
- Representation: Brands should feature seniors in ads, not as rare exceptions but as part of the everyday outdoors.
- Inclusive design: Outdoor companies need to consult with older hikers when designing gear.
- Education: Guides and club leaders should receive training about age bias and how to create welcoming environments.
- Policy: Employers must ensure hiring practices value experience over age.
Most importantly, we need to celebrate what older hikers bring to the trail: resilience, wisdom, patience, and plenty of adventure.
This is an excellent and powerful argument for remembering those of us over 60, and I’m glad you pointed out the financial absurdity of the larger outdoor industry ignoring our purchasing power. While 20-somethings are often stressed about making economic sacrifices to buy gear and get out, we retired codgers usually buy what we want and go when we feel like going.
One exception to the exclusion premise is that of trail organizations. Go out on just about any trail maintenance crew and you’ll see a lot of gray hair. It’s routine for folks in their 60s and 70s to be the ones doing a lot of the trail clearing on the BMT and AT.
Trail organization also fall into the ageism trap. There is lots of emphasis on recruiting young members, but young people don’t join clubs anymore…that social vehicle has been replaced by online virtual “clubs”. I think more outreach should be made to older members who still value the social connections of getting together in person. There is a steady stream of new recruits, as people get older and appreciate, even seek, in person connections. We’re all living a lot longer…my parents lived to their 90s and I plan to surpass them!
This makes me laugh, remembering hiking and backcountry skiing in Ottawa with my friend Bill from the Alpine Club of Canada. He was in his late 60s, I was in my late 40s, and did I ever struggle to keep up with him!
What a ridiculous article… hikevo don’t hike, but don’t expect the world to cater to you because you think everyone else should be paying attention to you. I am a 64 year old avid hiker… have hiked day hikes rim-to-rim in the Grand Canyon 8 times. I use clothing and gear, I am not really too worried about who is modeling it.
Phil, excellent and timely article. Thankyou. Paul.
This is another one of those woke articles written to draw attention to fake problems. The products listed the older hikers want is EXACTLY what is being produced. That is light weight, ergonomic, with a focus on comfort. For example, look at the growth of Hoka and ON in the shoe world. Most people in in management of these companies are in this age range. Demographics and purchasing power absolutely isn’t being ignored. This us fake outrage.
As far as not feeling included, get over it. That is and has been human nature since we could walk thousands of years ago. If anything this current generation of boomers have had it easier than any generation prior, or that will come simply due to size.
Give me a freaking break!
Actually, ageism permmeates the media, hiring practices, etc. It really does exist. But you’re entitled to your opinion.
Caleb, How old are you? Hokas? Why can’t they make trail runner or a model other than the Bondi (street shoe) in 4E to compensate my neuroma and neuropathy? Or why do I have a collection of brand new insoles that I immediately replace with my custom orthotics that cost as much as the shoes? Why doesn’t Outdoor Research make a wider bivy to accommodate my bigger air mattress that I carry because of my arthritis? Or, a longer zipper instead of the clam shell entrance in my Helium model (the Ascentshell has a longer zipper but is narrower than the Helium, so I can’t get my Big Agnes – that’s an air mattress – in it) that I struggle every time to get in or out of? Any of the clothing manufacturers? Why don’t they make clothing that fits my shorter/wider body type? (Yes, I have shrunk 1-3/4” since High School due to years of gravitational forces compressing my spine and contributing to the arthritis and 3 herniated discs that I hike with, but I’m still in pretty good shape even after the 6 knee, 3 shoulder, wrist and prostate cancer surgeries. Probably from not having to give up boxing until I was 50). Get off your high horse Caleb. Sure, there are products being made with Seniors in mind. And, there are Seniors who are in great physical shape who don’t require special considerations. However, there are many of us who still can’t find many of the products we would like to have to make our backpacking trips more comfortable. Seeing as how I can only go down steps with my right foot first due to the 6 operations on my right knee from football, I sure wish Leki would design trekking poles with a better shock absorption system. Come visit my world sometime Caleb. I still love to hike. It’s about all I can still do. I can’t even swim due to the 3 shoulder operations (from competitive powerlifting). However, there are still many opportunities out there for gear improvements to help Seniors. Hope your older years are more comfortable than mine. Good luck Caleb. I wake up most mornings wondering, “What’s not going to work today?” Whatever it is, I hope they can come up with a solution to help so I can still get out and enjoy the great outdoors.
Sorry Jay, it’s not because of ageism, it’s because of demand. If they could make a lot of money making 4E shoes & whatever else, they would. They’re not trying to keep the gray hairs down.
Bro, lighten up. Not everything is woke or a conspiracy, especially on trail where conditions can be harsh and non-forgiving. So what if seniors want to talk about their trail challenges. If you don’t like it just nope right on by.
well said! Thank you.
Woke? What does that mean, exactly, in this context?
Could you give a detailed explanation because I am not understanding.
I agree with Caleb 100%. Many good articles here but this is a nothing sandwich. The only ageism is from mother nature itself with the aches and pains she dishes out. However the use of wraps, braces, trekking poles and proper footwear can keep many older hikers going into their late 70’s and beyond. I see people above 60 on the trail all the time and no one seems to even think about age discrimination. There’s not someone at the trailhead saying “no you can’t hike on this trail you’re too old.” And group acceptance? Whatever, I just want to be outdoors and if I have another person to hike with fine, but more than one is usually a hinderance.
Please keep this conversation civil. I’ve removed two comments that I felt were insulting. You don’t have to agree with the opinions expressed here, but there’s no call to be demeaning to other commenters.
I think he’s spot on here. There is a huge amount of ageism in the outdoor media. I really couldn’t give a dam about 20-something thru-hikers, run some stories about what we older folks can achieve and our evolution as hikers to inspire others.
I think Philip’s intended audience for this article are the brands that make outdoor gear and the outdoor media, not you “gentlemen” who are already avid hikers.
Yep, you nailed it.
Agreed! As I’m almost 66 and an avid late comer to hiking over 6 years ago, I go at my own pace and don’t let being older discourage me.
How about women hikers in our mid-70’s and older.I may be slower but still enjoy hiking and the hiking community. I no longer hike with a club or younger people. I find they are more insetted in making miles than enjoying the beauty of nature.
Spot on Doris. My experience with many younger hikers has been the same.. I’m 75, still love hiking and backpacking, am capable (tho not quite as fast as I once was), and I hike with two groups of seniors that has members in their 70’s and 80.s. We cover the miles but not as fast but we go the same number of miles. We enjoy the scenery, nature, and camaraderie along the way. But note: many times the younger hikers do look to us over hikers because of our experience and willingness to share which I willingly do
Funny, I never really thought about this. Im 70, yikes, and I’ve hiked since I was 15. Started in the White Mountains of NH. Lived in Nepal for two years. Hiked out west. Mostly the Pacific NW. 95% of the time by myself. If it’s a day hike I make sure I have time to get down. Even if it means not making it to the top. I prepare to spend the night if necessary.
I make sure my gear is good and im prepared physically and emotionally. Im slower and I don’t run the trails anymore. Three months after leaving the ICU with covid in 2020 I was hiking my physicality test trail. The Jewel trail up Mt. Washington. All was good. Last year was good. We will find out in a couple of weeks how this year fairs. Maybe im naive but im shooting for 10 more years.
My happy place is in the mountains especially above the tree line.
Woke or no woke. I do not care what people think.
WOKE is good as it reflects sensitivity to all people regardless of their age or circumstances. The article does show that sensitivity and the conversation around older hikers thoughts and needs is very healthy.
I thank Phillip for publishing it.
I’ve hiked/backpacked for 50 years and never really had an issue with ageism except at REI – despite their recent inclusion marketing campaigns. It seems that I’ve become more invisible to the green vests as I’ve gotten older. On the rare occasion that a sales person comes over, they usually assume I know nothing and are often condescending. Despite being a coop member for over 35 years, I rarely shop at REI any more (my 2024 dividend was under $10). The last time I was in an REI was at their SoHo location. After looking around while being watched by groups of green vests standing around talking to each other or with their faces in their phones, I sat in their shoe department, connected to their WiFi, and ordered about $2K worth of gear – from their competitors.
I am knocking on the door of 60 so I can relate. However, with 50 years of experience, do you really need the REI sales people to helf you with anything? My interactions are limited to “Can I see this one in a 10 wide”
That’s exactly what I needed them for. By the time I go into an REI or any other type of store, my research is done and the decision is already made. My only use for the green vests it to get something that is not on the floor. REI is sliding into irrelevance. There are lots of credible information sources besides some random person in a green vest, the stores have become more outdoor chic fast fashion (especially SoHo) and carry less gear, and their e-commerce is among the worst due to slow fulfillment and the use of terrible delivery services.
Not sure this is ageism, though. REI employees have gotten pretty good at ignoring me too and I’m in my mid-40s with hardly any gray hair and look younger than I am. The last couple of times I went in there to try on shoes it took awhile to get anyone’s attention, in one case because there were too many customers and too few employees and in another case because the employees were difficult to locate. In the 2nd case the woman was pretty attentive once I tracked her down, but I suspect that the real issue is that REI needs to hire more employees.
I’m afraid that REI is just a mail order house at this point. I only go to the stores to return things.
What this article says to me is that you always have to be advocating for yourself, and when you don’t, you get left behind.
The difference is, some people rely on others to “let them” rather than doing what they want and being proactive.
Very well said. At 73 I am still hiking and camping. I dont see any gear changes and still go SUL as much as possible. The only unfortunate change is that Isaac Newton was wrong about gravity. It is not a constant but increases with age making it easier to fall and harder to get up!
I applaud Werner for being open to the article and feedback.
Amen
Maybe because REI laid off all their ‘Leads’ and replaced them all with minimum wage, part ime employees…. who are mostly young no nothings?
Phil,
Thank you for this excellent article and for all that you do for the hiking community.
Hello,
I’m thankful I can add to the discussion created by Phillip.
Phillip and others are correct, I feel the outdoor industry has failed us, REI and other outdoor stores has failed, the industry as a group or neighborhood doesn’t exist. With the demise of a once successful national trade show the industry has fallen apart. This is a much larger issue than ignoring a very important segment of the outdoor market that can afford products and need new products. Now where do we find ourselves, rudderless it seems. Products are not developed for specific use, user or need of user. Yes, buckets have been established for products perhaps to general. They are in the business of meeting only their owners goals.
The mature users have a lot to knowledge to share, they for the most part enjoy talking of past adventures, they can create a great platform to speak from, business says we don’t count, well that part of the issues these days. Club and retailers used to be a gathering point of information, that’s not happening any more.
I joined as a member REI in the early 1970’s I carry a member number 202xxx and have operated a retail outdoor store, worked as a sales representative, general manager all in the outdoor space. Additionally I’ve climbed and hiked in many states in the US, Canada and Europe. I completed my first accession of the NH 48 high peaks in 2000. Then again completed all over again in 2024 at the age of 77. I’m not here to boost my ego only to support my comments.
“The only source of knowledge is experience”
Albert Einstein.
Thank you all for your contributions. And keep going outdoors.
Bruce
“I’m not here to boost my ego only to support my comments.” This is an interesting point you make. I, too, often have to use my hiking resume examples in order to get people to take me seriously as a hiker (as I commented on below, women too have experienced bias in the outdoor recreation world; it definitely has improved in recent years but still also definitely exists). Now, in my case, I’m a pretty slow hiker (I blame my asthma) so it’s often necessary for me to cite my resume to assure people that I do, in fact, know what I’m doing, that I can go the distance if I have the time, as they see me puffing my way up a mountain.
Bruce, I fear the “failure” you correctly point to is deeper and more profound. The dynamics of the outdoor industry are a symptom of our political economy. My Svea 123 still runs great, but our economic system is in need of a major upgrade.
Regarding REI… IMO it’s not that REI has failed us, it’s that we’ve failed it. Like you, I have a 6 digit member number dating back to the mid 70s. But we, the members, have forgotten the co-op bit, or worse, fell into the habit of thinking it’s just a way to get a refund. We the members of the co-op need to recover the skills of exerting democratic control and a single retailer is just a warm up hike for the real mountains we face. Consumer choices and voting are both insufficient definitions of democracy, IMO.
The online hiking “clubs” (eg, MeetUp) are only social if you can keep up. Most seem to be nothing more than a trailhead gathering and the group quickly splinters as people hike their own pace. There is little regard for inexperienced or slower hikers regardless of age… these people often end up on a solo “group” hike.
By comparison, the organized clubs focus on skills and, to a much greater extent, group hikes. Although I haven’t seen any bias against older hikers I don’t doubt that it exists. But it’s also up to the participant to register for hikes that align with their fitness, skills, and experience. Try reaching out to the trip leader if you think you’re being excluded — discuss any concerns they may have about you. And be prepared to talk about recent trips you’ve done that are similar in difficulty, pace, altitude gain, etc.
Clubs members typically span a wide range of ages. Consider classes to meet new people, build skills, and learn what gear others are using. Anyone who solely trusts a gear manufacturer for info about gear may want to get a second opinion (eg, SectionHiker).
Most hobbies and activities have a barrier to entry, whether it’s cooking, sewing, photography, or even hiking. Seek out people in your community and ask questions. In my experience it doesn’t take long to find someone who will share their knowledge. If you expect to be catered to, you might be waiting awhile.
I was about to make a post, when I read this. Bunny, you said it all. Present your abilities and intentions accurately, find a community that you can relate to, take care of your aging body, and the joy of hiking will take you through your 80’s. Don’t let the whims of corporate marketing departments or the attitudes of young store clerks bother you…how important is that to your happiness, really? You don’t walk into a cairn; you go around it.
Bunny, I agree with your assessment of how hikes “begin and end” as to group cohesion. But perhaps that may also be reflective of a leader’s abilities, group size as well as to how a certain hike is advertised. For example, I’m 75 and have caved for over 50 years. While I no longer push myself to the risks I used to take and have traded judgment (and longevity!) over impetuosity, it’s also on me to try and select the appropriate companions. (Frankly, given the inherent dangers, I try to go with people better than me and not the adrenalized young bucks who don’t have enough sense/experience to realize the scope of some of the risks they take.) I have also created specialized equipment that works for me and compensates for 12 surgeries.
More to the point, I’ve noticed that the organized caving groups in the SE have become more specific in their trip ads and note the difficulty of the trip, expected length, equipment needed and required experience level. So, at least you know what you’re getting into before you get into it. Likewise, the leaders seem to have more control over the groups and thus folks stay together more (and don’t get lost!) They also limit the size of the group to a more manageable 8-10 which may not be the case with some hiking clubs which many seem to be open to any size group. I would think the larger the crowd, the more it’s likely to separate into splinter sub-groups.
Finally, I guess to a degree, and along with being informed of any particular hike, the hikers mentality needs consideration. If they see something as just a “walk in the woods” with some folks, that’s one thing and would likely cause more ability level related splintering as you noted. OTOH, if it’s a “hike” with a destination and noted ability/activity level, then the applicant may be better prepared equipment and experience wise to stick with the group. And then there’s always human nature…
Considering how many 60+ hikers have been able to out-hike me even since I was in my 20s, this is completely misguided. People who are 60 and over are in no way, shape, or form “less capable” than younger people and companies who think this are remarkably short-sighted. On the contrary, if they were smart, they would have *more* older gear ambassadors, etc, because folks who are just starting to retire seem to be the most adventurous people around. They have more time by far than the rest of us, which means they are able to really stay in good hiking shape, and often have more disposable income too even if they are losing their yearly salaries.
Ageism is definitely a thing but it really, really shouldn’t be. I liken this to the way women were treated in the late 1900s and early 2000s – there was a perception that women couldn’t hike, couldn’t climb, etc (and more). Nowadays this perception has mostly gone away, and just about any gear you can think of has a women’s version (except for some of the ultralight backpacking companies…they really need to get on that!), so here’s hoping all you tough older folks will help change the perception and get companies to cater better to older people. I mean, let’s face it – plenty of us younger folk would likely benefit from gear more specific to older bodies anyway.
What a bunch of unadulterated BS. I’m 75 and just finished yearly 5-day in Gramd Cyn of Tuolumne (Yosemte). Never have felt left out, slighted or in any way disrespected. Respect is common. Old snow?
I tend to agree, but a lot of people are passive, and wait for others to let them into the club.
Others, like myself, just push my way into where I need to go with little regard for being allowed to feel like a hiker.
Who cares what they think?
REI ain’t stopping me from buying stuff. Who cares if they ignore me? They aren’t my mamma.
Interesting article. As a young person I didn’t even know this was a thing, but now I can try to watch out for it. Gear is the category that I’m especially surprised to hear; low cushion shoes def took over but now Hokas are getting recommended left and right. Ultralight backpacking gear seems to be more and more standard, including with backpacks; I see lots of sub 2 lb packs recommended on gear websites, and even brands like Osprey & Gregory are trying to get in on the lightweight trend. Then you even have lots of smaller brands coming out with gear that innovates not just on weight but also comfort and functionality such as Aarn Packs, Durston, Zpacks, Katabatic, etc.
Aarn has been around for at least 20 years…on their second ower. No new products as far as I can see and I’ve been in touch with them.
Out of everything Henry wrote your only disagreement is about Aarn? Makes me think this article might be clickbait. I like your site, but this post really feels like a manufactured issue. There are legitimate issues about diversity and inclusion, and ageism is part of that discussion. But ageism for able-bodied, primarily white, relatively affluent boomers isn’t part of it IMO.
No disrespect, Philip. I’m just not sure where you’re going here. (My personal focus is helping people learn outdoor skills, people who didn’t grow up in a way that promoted outdoor activities, to promote a more inclusive outdoor experience. I also regularly donate gear instead of re-selling it.)
I just thought the inclusion of Aarn was worth clarifying.
You’ve been reading and commenting on this website for a while, so I’m surprised that you could even think this is clickbait. I think it’s a legitimate problem. Do some searching on google for “hiking for senior citizens”. The results speak for themselves. “before starting a new exercise program check with your doctor” – when is this ever mentioned for a younger audience?
Fair points, thanks for adding that info. FWIW, I’ve seen the. “consult with your physician” warning for people of a certain age for ALL exercise programs, not just hiking. (Also for pregnant people, who generally are a younger audience.)
As I said above, I agree that ageism is an issue. I see it in the workplace almost every day. And when I’m hiking, my body reminds me that I’m also not getting younger — I don’t need Big Outdoor ™ to remind me!
One of the reason I left the software industry, nearly 20 years ago, is because I knew I’d have a hard time getting hired in start-ups again, which is the fast-paced environment I like to work in. The main reason was because I felt the age discrimination. No one wants to hire a guy for a senior position when he’s twice the age of the founders!
Just out of curiosity, why didn’t you mention this in your book on hiking over 60?
It only became more salient to me recently as I began to promote my first book. It’s already in my next book. In the meantime, I think it’s a cause worth reminding people about.
Great! Not only glad to hear that there’s a second book coming, but that this will be in it. Will it have more on backpacking than the first book?
Patience grasshopper. All will be revealed eventually.
Very insightful article with many salient points to support your assertions. If you spend time hiking, climbing, and engaging with other mountain related activities over a long period of time, you gain experience. You also grow older and become a slightly wrinkled up version of your younger self. That outward appearance opens up a door for judgement. In some cases, those who judge, dump you in the waste heap because of your outward appearance. I suppose a similar type of discrimination can hit any other segmented group in the broad range of outdoor adventurer’s. Of course, opinions will vary on my perspective, but I take it as it is. Even though my mountain resume is fairly extensive, I endure the slights from others that come from many directions. Ageism included. They do occur and it is what it is. Frankly, I could care less what someone else says about me or what judgements they opt to place upon me. Those outside distractions only matter if I obsess about them or give them any more time than they deserve. The wisdom of age and the slow process of my maturing nature helps keep things in a healthy perspective. Then, I go climb mountains and walk on remote paths. Mostly alone and with a big smile on my face.
And if you seventy ish hikers who have hiked the grand canyon? I applied for a back country. Permit on a whim and got one and now i’m questioning whether I can do it!! Looking for personal experience tips. It’s on the hermit trail
I’m 73 and we spent 6 days and 5 nights below Rim in the Grand Canyon a year ago. You can do it!
We did the Tapeats Creek/Deer Creek loop. There were 3 major 1500′ (500m) ascents coming back from the river. Our permit worked out to 1 ascent per day, which made it quite doable. On the AT, you’ll do a 1500′ ascent for breakfast.
We hiked from 7am to 11am, took a break in shade until about 4pm, then hiked into about 7pm and set up camp. Our only problem was that animals tore into one of our water caches, which was a bladder from boxed wine. I think wine in the box beats Jack in the Box any day! The critter kindly left us about a liter in that torn up bladder. Our caches that were gallon plastic bottles of drinking water were safe.
Go for the Grand! There’s nothing like that place!
Hi Karen, I’m 76 and have done 47 Grand Canyon backpacks. Maybe five on the Hermit. A lot depends on when you are going and what your background is. It is an amazing place, well worth figuring out.
It is perfectly reasonable for you to be questioning whether you can do it.
I favor November and February, times I find comfortably cool temperatures which translates into relatively safe travel and hopefully seasonal seep springs flowing.
Please, don’t do, or under estimate the dangers of, the warm months unless you have a ton of desert, warm and hot temperature experience.
Happy to answer questions.
Karen, your request opens the door to SO much info it’d be impossible to address here, but Herman is certainly a great trail and less of an interstate than the Bright Angel. It’s also quite steep for the initial 2.5 miles which drops @ 2,000′ and gets you to Santa Maria Springs, a somewhat (but not totally) reliable water source. Cathedral Stairs is also steep. Given this, I’d strongly advise hiking poles with shock absorbing springs in them. Learn how to properly use them and adjust the length for both down and uphill walking.
I’ve done about 500 miles in the Canyon by foot and water and while it is worth every effort, it is also very unforgiving of mistakes. I’ve gotten frostbite in June and baked in 110 in October, so the weather can be quite unpredictable not to mention the fires there now as I write. What is predictable is summer peak month day temps which can be well over 100 and are unadvisable for trips. (“But it’s a dry heat…” Right!) Likewise, winters can be pretty brutal. I’ve stepped over rattlesnakes, scorpions and tarantulas and gotten punctured by cacti thorns. I’ve also had hyponatremia, which is from drinking too much, you dilute your body’s sodium to dangerous levels. It isn’t fun and can be fatal. Headaches and muscle cramping are the earlier signs, so be aware of them. In short, make sure you have access to some salt and other electrolytes to balance out your increased water intake.
Other generalized suggestions are hike early, rest and be amazed mid-day, and then pick up again late afternoon as others have noted. Likewise, do not be surprised, and be prepared for, the dramatic temperature swings day to night. Also remember if you are doing a day loop, you are essentially climbing a mountain in reverse. This means when you are most tired, you have the hardest part of the hike ahead of you: Uphill! As to campsites, stay out of gullies, ravines or “dry” stream beds as flash flooding can occur from rainstorms 20 miles away you never were even aware of. If you are near water, camp with enough berth so animals can access it and not be scared away. They are totally dependent on it.
Make an effort to be in shape before doing Hermit as it is somewhat demanding. BUT, the Canyon is a trip like no other on earth. It simply demands extra prep and precautions to make it safe and enjoyable. Last time I was there, cell phones were useless below the rim and satellite was required, but that may have changed by now. Finally, if you really want to cover your bases, consider a helicopter evac policy from a national scuba diving association (sorry I don’t recall their name; cost used to be $25.00) as a back-up. Just remember, this only functions if you have a means of contact, so we’re back to cell coverage or satellite. As opposed to this, perhaps you could also substitute one of the newer personal locater beacons? In any case, be safe – you’re in for a magnificent experience!
This link may be useful for you. https://hikearizona.com/decoder.php?ZTN=216
Gary
I’m a 68 year old, 5’3” female, who always gets easy-moderate hikes recommended from NPS rangers, even when I ask for hard ones. Really tired of that attitude, I know my capabilities.
When I was crossing the Grand Canyon at age 71-1/2 I met an avid hike who was almost 82. In 2021 I spent 3 nights on the Teton Crest. In 2022 I joined the Yamhill County Search and Rescue. I’m 77 now and using CalTopo to prepare maps for day hikes during a four week trip to Glacier NP and four parks in Alberta. However, in 2023 when I backpacked in the Olympics I decided to only day hike after that. Two of the many factors in that decision could be age related:
1. Backpacking requires me to carry more weight than I want to.
2. Sleeping uncomfortably.
Yes, if I spent a BUNCH of money I could buy ultralight gear that would help with these issues, but not worth it for the few times I’d use it.
As a hiker who is approaching 60, I read your article with interest. I have hiked multiple years on the John Muir Trail, I didn’t really start hiking till I was in my early 50’s. I do agree with some of what you say. But it’s complicated. I am generally a solo hiker, and I have joined up with people for short parts of the trail, I have never felt that I was not welcome into a trail family because I’m the “old guy”. Myself or anyone else would probably not feel welcome into a trail family if were the “slow guy” that was slowing down the group. We all tend to gravitate towards tramily that share our interests and hiking speed and that tends to be people that are similar ages. Other dynamics I have to think about as an older man, many younger girls, particularly if they’re hiking as a girl group or a solo girl, are very wary of older men in general, this is more of a societal and personal safety issue than it is an age issue, and I totally get it. As an older male, I’m conscientious about how I approach females on the trail, what I say, and my body language.. I believe the older hiking demographic is also represented in social media. Senior hiker77 (US) and Paul Mesnner (UK) a couple off the top of my head. But the over 55 demographic represents a huge number of hikers that are out there on our trails, probably the single biggest demographic.of any age group. More representation in social media, at outfitter stores and just overall is probably long overdue for the number of seniors actually out on the trails.
The oldest person to finish this year’s TGO Challenge (annual coast to coast hike across Scotland) is 86 years old. Most of the participants tend to be older, don’t get in their way. At 61, it kicked my ass.
Same here. My (60M) 20 year old son and I met up with a group of 70 somethings resting on the side of a path. We all started walking together. Within a half mile they were 200 yards ahead of us. We met up with my wife in Edinburgh. She was starting to feel bad about how she couldnt keep up with “old” people walking up Arthur’s Seat. We were like, no, you cant underestimate these UK old timers. They’ll walk rings around you.
When I read “These dynamics can lead to self-exclusion: older hikers may stop…” my mind began to auto-complete the sentence.
May stop wanting the annoyance of keeping up inane conversations.
May stop wanting to accommodate group dynamics.
May stop wanting to stick to an agreed upon route.
May stop wanting to match paces with anyone.
May stop wanting to provide advice or blister care to younger, less experienced hikers.
May stop wanting to have their thoughts interrupted.
All I can say is that at the age of 63 I am insanely grateful for my Garmin InReach. Well over half of my trips are solo now and to be honest, I very much prefer it that way.
I’m 66, almost 67…
I guess I don’t really care about the age of people modeling the gear. Maybe i just need to get older, but I don’t see much difference between gear that works for me at my age, and gear that works for younger people.
I am sure there is ageism in many aspects of life – i would hate to be looking for professional work at this age. I think it would be nearly impossible to get an interview.
And.., as far as REI goes; I have been a member since the ’80s. They lost the plot long ago…, but I have almost no choice for in-person shopping.
The ageism I experienced on an old favorite hike was welcome and accommodating. We had too much weight and too little fitness for our ambitions, and suffered a minor fall early in. Other, younger hikers were quick to help us assess our state, consider the do-ability of our plan, and help us with our too-heavy loads. While we quickly turned back and enjoyed a much shorter distance trip, we came home glad for the assistance and with a plan to go do more (easier) backpacking trips.
In-store, this article woke me up to noting ageism at retail outlets is routine and degrades the gear/supply choices I can make. While the condescension and disinterest is there, I like feeling pity toward their naivete rather than offense at their arrogance. I’ve watched salespeople give the same mix of info & misinfo to others that they gave me, just with more engaging tone and confidence. Now I’m thinking it’s me internalizing their ageist treatment that makes me feel different in-store than I did 30 years ago. As a young person I’d walk in feeling like I owned the place, and had a great time out shopping. Now I feel like “invisibility is my new superpower” but the seeking help is more tedious and less rewarding than I’d like.
I personally, at 65, can’t say I have experienced this or noticed. I do however get tired of the inclusion discussion by every group that exist and flag waving. What brings us all together is the love of the outdoors. That’s enough for me.
I hit 80 last month. Had knees replaced two years ago which greatly improved my quality of life in many ways including hiking. I have not been over two miles in easy up and down hikes mostly in the GW National Forest. I hike with my German Shepherd Dog as a companion. Never hiked with more than one other person. I don’t start early which makes it more difficult to join groups. Big believer in being prepared for the unexpected. Carry a Garmin InReach 2 to be safe. Have two contacts with whom I share my routes via email in just in case I have a problem. I’ve tried to encourage friends in their 70s to join me but have not been successful. They claim their health issues are a barrier which I think is bull shit. Had a neighbor who refuse to join me driving on old logging roads because he was pain scared to be out in the woods. I don’t hike when it’s really cold or too hot. We all need to adapt as we get older, but still much more we can do in the out of doors than we give ourselves credit for doing.
Wow, I am almost 70, and today I am packing for a 155-mile solo-backpacking trip in Colorado where I live (yesterday, I hiked 16 miles and 3,700 ft elevation gain). I took a break from my packing and was surprised (and happy) by the energy behind this discussion thread. Overall, I think there have been good points on both sides of the issue.
One thing nice about being an old-fart is thru our experience, we tend to get more knowledgeable and, hopefully, gain more wisdom. Two years ago, I hiked the PCT during that terribly snowy season. I found many 20-somehting-year-olds coming to me seeking informaiton on using & self-arresting with an ice axe, suggestions on improving their kit, and how to handle different over-use injuries. My point: There are bendfits to being an old-fart. It realyy surprised me when the young-bucks started calling me a “Tough-Old-Goat”.
There are political parts of our society that unfortunately have turned many identity-groups into victims. My last point: As senior citizens, lets not let ourselves become victims. Instead, lets go out into the Big Wild and have fun!
Phil, keep up the good work. If you ever get to Colorado, look me up. We can do some good-old-fashion-old-fart-hiking!
Best,
Dave
I’m 68 years young and a avid outdoorsman. I just completed the Annapurna Trek in the Himalayans. I was with 9 other international hikers for 15 days. I was old enough to be their dad and a few their grandad:) We accepted each other and appreciated the diversity in culture. I didn’t find that age was an issue. Like GT said we all had a love for the outdoors. I did get AMS while at base camp along with another hiker but was deeply moved by the concern and care provided by the other hikers. Just glad those young bucks could keep up:)
The one place I feel ageism is in clothing choices for older women. I don’t want to wear 3,5 or 7″ shorts that don’t cover my legs. Hiking shorts that are 10″ or longer can be hard to find that have well placed correctly sized pockets (thank goodness for Duluth Trading Dry on Fly that have 11″ length). Manufacturers of sports bras also should consider older women don’t like struggling to put one on. They are a number of aging related issues that makes putting on the average sports bra darn near impossible. I’m 66 and have hiking friends of all ages. It’s more about hiking with folks who have the same level of fitness and desire the same type of hike in regards to length, elevation change, pace, etc.
Great article, Philip, as an older hiker/biker (87) there is another aspect of why we are to a large extent ignored by the industry. We all have developed strong budgeting and frugal habits; we have survived many times of deprivation and tend to make do and mend. We are therefore not a profitable group of society to warrant targeted equipment development. I am not alone in this thinking within my group. We all look long and hard at what we need, weigh up the pros and cons, and then look for other people’s pre-loved items before considering costly new ones. This is why the outdoor industry does not think us worthy of their time.
At 64 I hiked the AZT this year. I had a number of conversations with others in my age range about the different experiences interacting with younger thru-hikers on trail. Many would engage as equals, and both sides were better for it. I found it surprising and didn’t understand what was happening with few young folks who all but ignored those of us that were “older.” My peers pointed out that it was likely a maturity thing. It was the first time I had experienced what could be called ageism on the trail. Although, for the most part the the trail continues to be a great leveler.
I’m really surprised at the vitriol that is being communicated here. It proves that ageism exists.
I know it does. It permeates everything, so much so people think it’s the norm.
Interesting that not one comment and none of the content of the opinion piece was about trail maintenance or trail building. I volunteer for trail building and maintenance work in the BWCA and most of our volunteers are over 60. The “younger” members seem to enjoy our company (I’m 63) and, as noted several times already in comments above, our shared love of the natural world gives us powerful common ground. In one of the two groups I work with (Kekekabic Chapter of the NCTA) all our leaders are “old” (over 60). We do get some younger volunteers. In the other group I work with (Boundary Waters Advisory Committee) the leadership has been assumed by younger volunteers (30-50 years old) over the past few years but we still have plenty of “older” volunteers (one great volunteer is 77 years old, another is 73 years old).
I have never felt discriminated against when on the trail for fun or for work. And I understand and accept that the “youth market” is where the spenders are and they are the “target audience” of marketing groups (which see them as bigger spenders than old farts like me, and as potential life-long customers). I don’t need and don’t want to be the target of advertisements – and Bit T has it right about “older” (experienced) hikers having their act together and not needing to buy a lot of stuff or needing to buy the latest and greatest stuff.
Do good – have fun – everything else will fall into place.
Eric, you make good points. i volunteer for Friends of Mt Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness. We do work for the Forest Service, which includes trail maintenance, trail patrol & education, eraticating of noxious weeds, etc. Most of our volunteers are in their 60s & 70s. Overall, I find older hikers have a much stronger conservation-ethic, including Leave No Trace, than the younger-folk (especially the mountain-bikers). While most hikers are cool people regardless of age, I find especially on the long-distance trails that some younger hikers can have an arrogant/entiltled attitude and do not appreciate/understand the importance of protecting and conserving our public lands.
My only comment is that at age 78 I’ll be attending my first Orienteering event this coming weekend. I’m excited!! Whoohoo!!
Excellent piece.
I am 65, Phil. I truly feel like a late spring chicken. But I never have difficulty in climbing the flight of steps, leading to my crow’s net hideaway house, fifty meters above the ground.
But then, from 98 kilos, I long distances walked to reduce and get fit to about fifty-eight now. But I don’t go anymore of summer hunts in the outback with a companion, for water fowls, crane and other birds.
No belly crawling over rough terrain. But attention draw to sixties something is welcomed.
With regard to gear, it was the emergence of lightweight gear from cottage companies that got me back into backpacking in my 50’s. While it was marketed for the “fast and light” crowd, it was obvious to me that it worked just as well for the “doesn’t destroy your joints and light” crowd. I have very little gear from major gear makers. One thing I have is a Garmin Mini satellite communicator. I do sometime see these marketed as being especial valuable to old hikers, as if we are at risk of dropping dead at any moment.
Among AT long distance hikers, the people of retirement age are well represented. Most of the people I met in Maine last year were among the older set, and the young people I met were all pleasant and welcoming. They didn’t slow down to hike at my speed and I certainly didn’t expect them to. Among those volunteering to maintain the trail, that group is over-represented.
Being old (I’m now 66) has its advantages. For one, I don’t give a rat’s a$$ about the message being portrayed on social media. I am willing to bet those being influenced by social “influencers” are not my age group, and we are the better for it. So I think many of the concerns raised in the article are not particularly relevant for a person such as myself who is already a competent hiking enthusiast. But the idea that a newcomer may feel less welcome or not have the resources needed to succeed, that may be where the issue lies. But on the other hand, I think studies show that young people are not being drawn to outdoor recreation as they have in the past either. To the issue may not be age-specific.
Interesting article and even more interesting comments. A few folks need to go for a walk before sitting down to type! Anyway, I’m 61 and a lifelong hiker and backpacker, but it gets harder every year. I also have less time to exercise with my executive position (not whining, just stating). I’m very much looking forward to some day retiring and spending more time staying fit!
As a female, I’ve experienced so much sexism in my life and still do, that the ageism I’ve so far encountered seems only amusing, with people calling me “hun” and telling me “you’re almost there!” to encourage my panting self to get to the top of a pass. “Good job, you’re my inspiration!” lol. One of my goals in getting older is to see the humor in everything; it’s there if we seek it and boy does it make life more satisfying and takes the edge off the unintended slight here and there. And of course on trail humor helps you endure the hardships. For sure ageism is real, and shows up in all parts of our lives. I’m still able to do a lot of hiking, and at a not too unreasonable pace, but it is harder to find companions. So far my lightweight gear has served me well, but the hand dexterity is difficult, so any products that make that easier are welcome. Easy tear packages – that’s a dream! Clamshell plastic should be banned and its inventor brought to trial.
One last comment. “Americans over 50 control nearly 70% of disposable income” – ya know, that is one reason young people hate our freakin guts. They can’t get apartments, can’t find decent jobs. Those of you who have some to spare might consider what a terribly difficult world we have given our children/grandchildren, the immensely difficult problems we’ve made their inheritance (climate change, political instability, etc.), and perhaps provide some assistance. I see these 4 bedroom giant McMansions everywhere with two elderly people toddling around and wonder if it isn’t time for everyone to downsize and let the kids have the house. Ageism will only be more prevalent if the boomers continue to hoard it all. Let’s be nice to them so they’ll help carry our tents.
I smiled at receiving this article from my husband. I have enjoyed the outdoors for 68 years. I use stretch bands and dumbbells to keep arthritis at bay. BUT this fall I noticed I had more knee pain and stiffness after hiking/walking with my best friend, and couldn’t even keep up on Xcountry skis in January. I joined the local pool, but because I also tried to make it an aerobic exercise, I tore up what I learned was an already degenerative meniscus and had excruciating pain. After the cane and crutches, and doctors, X-rays, MRI, etc, I will get a new knee next week (wish me luck). It is now July and I have adapted over recent months. I bought sneakers with support and bought a pair of orthotics to use in other shoes and boots. I started walking and a light work out as knee would tolerate. Also, I learned that I can pedal and paddle way better than hiking currently so have been doing much more of that. I can’t say I pay much attention to gear ads or outdoor industry, but they could probably profit from catering to all us baby boomers.
This is a great article and the varied responses and points of view are so interesting. On the trails I always hike with “we stay together” types. Just works better to have this agreement ahead of time.
I have certainly felt the cold shoulder when trying to get the attention of someone at a store and the like. But, I have also had great and thoughtful conversations about trail conditions or shoe attributes with people young enough to be my grandchild. When I feel as though ageism is creeping into the store or info desk experience it is usually very effective to find a subtle way to intimate that the family vacation, hiking trips, equipment, boots, skis, backpack, classes, condo, bunk room etc. are often gifts from someone older and with lots of experience, passing on their love of the outdoor pursuits to the next generations.
One other thing that vendors could perhaps improve on for older hikers – for Farout, Gaia or other, a way to make the fine print on the topos more visible. Elevations, stream names, etc. are so small that even enlarging on a phone they’re still impossible to read. Suggestions welcome! I hate to get out cheaters just to glance at these while hiking.
Can’t speak to iPhone and maybe not on all map layers (it works on the base GAIA layer, not sure about others, I haven’t played with it myself) – but if you go into the account settings there is a function to increase label sizes. You can also adjust a few other map attributes there.
GaiaGPS deliberately omits streams. Why would a mapping app for hikers and backpackers do that? The reason you can’t read the stream names is because they’re not there!