This post may contain affiliate links.

Merrell Moab 3 Hiking Shoe Review

Merrell Moab 3 Hiking Shoe Review

The Merrell Moab is the most popular hiking shoe in the world with over 25 million shoes sold since it was first introduced 15 years ago. Now in its third generation, the Merrell Moab 3 (Merrell dropped the word ‘Ventilator’ in this new model), is very similar to its predecessor, the Moab 2 Ventilator, with a few changes including an improved factory insole, a more cushioned midsole, stickier Vibram soles, and more recycled content. If you’re looking for a low hiking shoe that’s very stable and supportive, has a wide toe box with good toe protection, and drains and dries quickly when it gets wet, the Moab 3 will satisfy your needs.

Specs at a Glance

  • Upper: Pigskin leather/mesh upper
  • Lining: Recycled mesh
  • Midsole: Super Rebound Compound (ie. foam)
  • Support: Molded nylon arch shank
  • Outsole: Vibram TC5+
  • Cushioning: Moderate
  • Fit: Runs wide and slightly long
  • Heel to Toe Drop: 11 mm
  • Lug length: 5 mm
  • Weight (pair): 2 lbs 1 oz (men’s size 9)
  • Waterproof Version Available: Moab 3 Waterproof
  • Wide Sizes Available: Yes (Merrell has the best selection)
  • Women’s Models: Yes

Midsole Support and Cushioning

Low hiking shoes like the Moab 3 are a good alternative to hiking boots because they’re much lighter but provide excellent midsole support. Most low hiking shoes also include a nylon or thermoplastic shank, a rigid strip of material in the midsole that helps support and protect the arch of your foot. The arch of your foot distributes pressure and impacts across your foot and helps align the ligaments, muscles, and bones in your legs and back. If your arch collapses, it leads to plantar fasciitis and acute heel pain, experienced by many hikers and backpackers.

The bottom of the toe box has much less cushioning than the midsole, heel or tongue, giving you a great deal of trail feel about the terrain underfoot.
The bottom of the toe box has much less cushioning than the midsole, heel, or tongue, giving you a great deal of feedback about the terrain underfoot.

Unlike hiking shoes, most trail runners don’t have shanks and instead rely on foam cushioning in the midsole, which loses resiliency and shock absorption with use, something that a rigid midsole shank is immune to. The Moab 3 does include a lot of cushioning as well, but it’s mainly concentrated in the midsole, tongue, and heel cup, and much less so under the toe box. This gives you a lot of feedback about changing surface conditions with each step you take, providing the shoes with an excellent level of “trail feel”, which is a little surprising to find in an otherwise burly trail shoe.


The Moab 3 has a Vibram outsole with well-spaced lugs that provide good traction across a variety of terrain. The rubber outsole isn’t as sticky as most trail runner outsoles, but the outsole is flexible enough for scrambling on granite and hiking along dirt and gravel-topped trails

The Moab 3 outsole has large 5mm lugs that provide a great bite in mixed terrain.
The Moab 3 outsole has large 5mm lugs that provide a great bite in mixed terrain.

The outsole has a slight midsole arch so they can be worn with gaiters and the forefoot and ankle are slightly rockered to assist in forward motion. The lugs are widely spaced to provide traction in mud and are positioned at multiple angles to provide good braking on descents. They also extend slightly out along the perimeter of the midsole which helps with edging and scrambling in rocky terrain. I found the firm sole to provide a good bite when traversing boulder fields and wet river rocks, with just enough give to grip pointed and rounded wet surfaces without slippage. Based on previous experience, I expect these firm Vibram soles will wear well with extended use.


The Moab 3 is a super stable, almost blocky shoe, with a wide toe box and midsole that tapers when it reaches the well-padded and cushioned heel. While the outsole is moderately firm, the shoe has good torsional flexibility to adapt to rocks and other trail obstructions. In hiking with the Moab 3 with a 25-30 lb pack, I didn’t experience any ankle rolls or instability, even when scrambling up and down our rocky White Mountain Trails.

The heavily padded tongue helps lock your foot inside the shoe, even when you crank the laces, without any noticeable pressure on the top of the foot. It also prevents your foot from sliding down into the toe box and jamming your toes on steep descents.

The Moab 3 includes a new insole with heel and metatarsal padding for a more cushioned ride.

In this latest version, Merrell has added a decent insole to the Moab 3, a new feature that makes it much more competitive with the Oboz Sawtooth X Low Hiker because Oboz includes such great insoles with all of its hiking boots and shoes. The insole provides more arch and heel support than the cheap foam inserts that most manufacturers put in their hiking shoes or trail runners. It also includes extra padding under the metatarsal heads in the ball of the foot and the heel.

Toe Box Width and Protection

As a hiker and backpacker, one of the first things I look at on a hiking shoe is the amount of toe protection at the front and along the sides of the toe box. Shoes with beefy toe kicks protect toenails from nail trauma (which often manifests as thickened toenails), while bumpers along the sides of the toe box protect from side impacts.

Like many of Merrell’s hiking shoes, the Moab 3 has a beefy toe kick that provides superior toe protection. It is an extension of the outsole, with front grooves that enhance the shoe’s grip and the sole’s flex when scrambling up inclined surfaces. Leather bumpers along the side of the toe box provide side protection while allowing the forefoot to flex freely.

The Moab 3 has excellent toe protection up front and along the sides of the toe box.
The Moab 3 has excellent toe protection up front and along the sides of the toe box.

The uppers along the side of the shoe are also made with pig suede leather and form a flexible but protective exoskeleton that protects the upper mesh from abrasion, while still allowing perspiration and moisture to escape. The heel is also well protected with leather and a rubber end cap, similar to the one protecting the toe box.

Ventilation and Drainage

The uppers on the Moab 3 are a porous mesh with protective leather strips for abrasion protection. The tongue and heel are heavily cushioned with a fleece-like fabric, while the forefoot has a synthetic mesh liner. Moisture and perspiration can escape through the mesh/mesh liner and around the ankle, keeping the inside of the shoe comfortable even in hot weather.

The rear of the Moab 3 is heavily protected and reinforced for stability.
The rear of the Moab 3 is heavily protected and reinforced for stability.

The Moab 3 dries very quickly when the upper gets wet in mud or puddles on the trail. If you completely submerge the shoe, say during a stream crossing, it drains very quickly, although some water does soak into the heavier cushioning around the heel and in the tongue. However, the fleece fabric covering the cushioning wicks moisture away from your foot and sock, so they quickly feel drier.

This wicking action helps migrate moisture to the shoe’s exterior where it can evaporate. The drying process can also be accelerated by putting the shoes in direct sunlight for a few hours. For what it’s worth, the shoe lining and cushioning is soft enough that it doesn’t cause blisters if you have to hike with the Moab 3s when they are still wet. But I prefer to avoid full submersion with these shoes if possible, even though they drain and dry much faster than a full hiking boot.


The Merrell Moab 3 is a ventilated (non-waterproof) hiking shoe with pigskin leather reinforcements along the sides and heel for abrasion protection. It’s a very stable shoe with a nylon shank in the midsole that supports and protects your arch, which is important if you carry a loaded backpack (and not something you’ll find on a trail-running shoe). The Moab 3 also has a large toebox, in terms of width and height, with plenty of toe protection on the front and sides. Fitwise, the Moab 3 runs surprisingly wide out of the box in a regular size width, so I’d recommend avoiding them if you have narrow feet unless you’re comfortable “shimming” out the extra room with a thick hiking sock. Drainage is excellent with a surprisingly short dry time, making the Moab a good choice if you’re looking for stable and supportive hiking shoes that combine the best properties of trail runners and hiking boots in one shoe.

Shop at REI


Disclosure: The author owns these shoes.

SectionHiker is reader-supported. We only make money if you purchase a product through our affiliate links. Help us continue to test and write unsponsored and independent gear reviews, beginner FAQs, and free hiking guides.


  1. I’ve looked at these before, but any shoe with webbing instead of regular eyelets is a hard pass for me. I tried a similar pair once and had the loops wear and eventually rip from repeated tightening. That’s something that just doesn’t happen with metal grommets.

    Thankfully it happened as I was leaving the house instead of in the middle of a trip, because the missing loop left the shoe loose fitting which would have made it dangerous to walk over uneven terrain.

    • I used to worry about that too, but webbing has replaced eyelets on most hiking footwear and it’s proven to be pretty durable and universal at this point.

    • The webbing loops on these and Oboz are good. It’s all in the type of material the shoe manufacturer uses, something like Kevlar is very abrasion and cut resistant, the laces should wear out before it breaks, and the rest of the shoe should wear out before it does too. I have had breaks with other footwear (Icon motorcycle boots for example) but not with any current name brand hiking shoes or boots that I can recall.

    • I on my 4th pair of MOAB’s! I just got the MOAB 3 and love them! Very comfortable to walk around in.

  2. How is the heel cup compared to the Moab 2? I tried the Moab 2 but my heels kept sliding up but my original Moab vents fit well in the heel.

    Also, how is the toe box compared to the la sportiva ultra raptor 2?

    • The heel cup is pretty much the same. The toe box is much wider and higher (good for hammer toes) than the ultra raptor 2.

      • I disagree. I used to wear Moab 2 gtx, size US13 and it felt roomy. This new Moab 3 gtx crushes my toes even already bought a size US14. Still too narrow and especially shallow from toebox.

  3. I am in my third pair of Moab hikers. Unfortunately on this pair, the sole unglued from the side of the boot after 6 months. Company won’t compensate because I no longer have receipt. Defective shoe. Poor customer service.

    • I only buy my shoes at REI for this exact reason. Returns for one year.

      • REI is the best for that reason.

        Moabs, Sawtooths, etc. always do that to me.

        Usually I expect shoes that I buy at a deep discount to come unglued after a week of hard use rubbing and scraping. Shoe Goo to the rescue! It holds better than new. Clean it out with an old toothbrush, work the glue in there, wrap the shoe up in tape to hold tight and wait 24 hours. The first time I had lots of excess glue everywhere but I’ve gotten pretty good at it.

  4. After the failure of two DANNER soles I have been a MERRILL user ever since. They fit (wide size) and they are durable.

  5. wife and I have 3 pairs of Moab 2’s and they have been terrible. Her stitching around the toes came undone on the first couple hikes. Mine have chunks of sole that have fallen off on simple hikes. All pairs have bad traction compared to our salomons. We find them dangerous on wet or steep trails. I hope the 3’s are better than the 2’s! But every shoe that I have ever owned that has different colors on the sole have not worn well. Merrell, TNF, Keen… if they have different colors on the sole, they suck!

    • While I understand the point you’re trying to make, I’m not sure it’s entirely fair to compare a hiking shoe with a trail runner. Trail runners will almost always have better traction because they have softer stickier soles than a hiking shoe like the Moab. But the Moab will have better support, as it has a built-in nylon shank, and the sole will last much longer because it’s harder.

  6. I have had 4 pairs of Moab 2 , the only thing I didn’t like was the soles ,no traction and slippery . The Moab 3 have been on my feet for three months ,same great shoe and really like the new soles . Better grip and not slippery !

  7. I recently purchased a pair of Lowa INNOX Pro boots to get away from the Gore-Tex lining. I’ll definitely take a look at the Moab 3 but, I have a narrowish, low-volume foot. Any other non-Gore-Tex boots out there?

    • Don’t even bother if you have a narrow foot. You’ll be swimming in a Moab 3.

    • I have the same desire for non-gore tex lining. i was fortunate to get a pair of Oboz Bridger Mid Vent before they were discontinued. Much more support than the Moab. Far more torsional rigidity than the Moab as well. Tough thing is: what will replace my Oboz? The selection of non-goretex boots has all but dried up. Bummer

      • Sawtooth II, the outgoing shoe that is being replaced by Sawtooth X is still available at discount. The IIs had excellent ventilation.

    • If I had a foot like that I’d be wearing Salomon X Ultras, but the toe box is tight for me and my midfoot spills over on the inside…

  8. I hike and backpack. I’m 70 years old and wear a 12 1/2 wide. I’m also a type 2 diabetic and have some nerve sensitivity issues in my feet. I have tried various different shoes, boots and trail runners. I have settled on the Merrill Moab in both waterproof and ventilated. I find these to be a comfortable and durable shoes. I haven’t had an issue with customer service because an outlet mall near by has a Merrill store with great customer service from knowledgeable employees.

  9. Bought Moab 3 a week ago. Passable on 5 mile dirt trail. Horrible on 2 mi paved trail even with ortho inserts. Hard on the balls of your feet, knees and lower back.

    • Agree. I have the same problems with the Moab 3s after 3 weeks, stopped wearing them. Constant muscle pain. Moab 2s were much more comfortable. went back to Alicos.

  10. I wonder how they compete against a Hoka Speedgoat…

    • I have Moab Mids and lows both with gore tex and the “ventilator” non gore tex models..This January I picked up a pair of Hoka Speedgoat 5’s. Speedgoats are way more comfortable for all day or long hikes. Yes you give up a little stability in the ankle but I have had no problem scrambling up granite pitches with them. They will wear out faster though than the merrel that is the only downside.

  11. Can anyone tell me if the Moab 3 can be used as a walking and hiking shoe? Just trying them and finding them super comfortable, but concerned if too much pavement walking might wear them down too soon?

  12. I have the Moab 2 and use for work, walking 10K to 15K a day on concrete. Used different insoles than what came with the shoe. The wear and tear is minimal. I love them as a work shoe.

  13. Just got a new pair of Moabs to replace a pair that lasted 8 months of heavy use. Side stitching undone but otherwise amazingly comfy. They honoured the warranty which was pleasing and the new pair does not have the fussy detail but also has loops rather than metal eyelets which tend to come loose. So generally improved design. No one here has mentioned the best part of these shoes, the Vibram soles. They are brilliant, so much support on those rough trails.

  14. For our 50th anniversary, my daughter bought me a pair of these. I can see why they’re so popular. When I section hike the AT, I switch back and forth between these and my La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II shoes. The Ultra Raptors are lighter, but these are beefier and handle more abuse, such as in Rocksylvania.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *