This post may contain affiliate links.

Osprey Exos Pro 55 Backpack Review

Osprey Exos Pro 55 Backpack Review

The Osprey Exos Pro 55 Backpack is a ventilated and adjustable-length ultralight backpack that weighs 33.2 oz. It’s basically an ultralight redo of the heavier Osprey Exos 58 Backpack, that’s 11.8 oz lighter-weight using recycled fabrics with a few minor changes to the design. Despite the weight reduction, the Exos Pro 55 remains a quite lively and dynamic backpack that is responsive and fun to carry. However, the use of thinner fabrics means that this pack is going to be somewhat less abrasion resistant than the heavier Exos 58, which is something to consider if you’re rough on backpacks.

Specs at a Glance

  • Weight: 33.2 oz (size S/M)
  • Stripable top lid weight: 2.6 oz
  • Volume: 55L
  • Closure: Top lid
  • Adjustable Torso Length: Yes
  • Ventilated: Yes
  • Hydration compatible: Yes
  • Pockets: 6, plus the main compartment
  • Frame: Internal aluminum perimeter frame
  • Torso: S/M: 17″ – 20″ (L/XL 21″-23″ also available)
  • Hip Belt: S/M: 28″ – 50″ (L/XL 30″-50″ also available)
  • Bear canister compatibility: BV500 or Garcia Backpacker’s Cache fit horizontally or vertically in the main compartment. They can also be held in place under the floating top lid pocket.
  • Materials: 100D Nylon x 200D UHMWPE ripstop w/DWR treatments made without PFAS
  • Maximum recommended load: 30 lbs

Who is the Exos Pro 55 For?

If you already own the heavier Osprey Exos 58, switching to the Exos Pro 55 is an easy way to shave close to 11.8 oz of pack weight while retaining the backpack feel and most of the features you’ve grown used to. The Exos Pro 55 is also a good option for people who want a lighter-weight ventilated backpack but don’t want to give up the convenience of a top lid pocket or the external attachment features found on more conventional multi-day backpacks. While you can switch to a more minimalist roll-top backpack like the ventilated Zpacks Arc Haul Ultra 60, doing so can require a pretty big change in how you pack and interact with your backpack during the day. Whichever way you choose to go, Osprey and Zpacks are still the only pack manufacturers to offer ultralight, ventilated, and adjustable-length backpacks.

How is the Exos Pro 55 different than the Exos 58?

The Exos Pro 55:

  1. Is 11.8 oz lighter weight than the Exos 58 (may vary depending on sizing).
  2. Does not have a second pocket under the top lid.
  3. Does not have separate sleeping pad straps on the front of the pack.
  4. The front stretch pocket has fabric loops along the sides that can be used to hang gear.
  5. The front stretch pocket has less mesh and more solid fabric for better durability.
  6. The left-hand hip belt pocket is open and not zippered.
  7. The adjustable torso length is secured using small dowels instead of larger plastic discs.
  8. There is a silicone print at the base of the suspended mesh to prevent slippage.
  9. The sternum strap only has three positions instead of a sliding rail adjustment.
  10. The shoulder straps are less padded.
  11. The shoulder straps only have 1 hydration hose keeper, not two.
  12. There’s no stow-on-the-go trekking pole holder.
  13. Uses thinner (200d) fabric in high-wear areas.

Backpack Organization and Storage

The floating top lid is wide enough to cover a BV500 bear canister
The floating top lid is wide enough to cover the ends of a BV500 bear canister and holds it securely in place on top of the main compartment.

The Osprey Exos Pro 55 is very different from most ultralight backpacks because it’s configured with a floating top lid instead of a dry-bag style roll top. With a single large top zippered pocket (with key fob), the floating lid lets you sandwich extra gear between the lid and the top of the pack’s main compartment so you can carry extra technical equipment or supplies that won’t fit inside your pack. Top lids are a great feature, especially when you need to carry bulky gear like bear canisters, rope coils, foam pads, or tent bodies that won’t fit into the main compartment of your pack. The top pocket also provides handy access to hats, gloves, snacks, and navigation gear and is indispensable for cold-weather use.

If you don’t need the top lid on the Exos Pro 55, you can remove it to save gear weight. This reduces the weight of a small/medium Exos Pro 55 by 2.6 ounces bringing it down to a respectable 30.6 oz (1 lb 14.6 oz).

The flap jacket can be used instead of the top lid.
The flap jacket can be used instead of the top lid. The flap jacket is not removable, however.

There’s a nylon flap under the top lid that is permanently attached to the pack, what Osprey calls a FlapJacket, that covers the drawstring opening of the main compartment. When you remove the top lid, the FlapJacket is used to protect the main compartment from the rain in its stead. The rear of the FlapJacket clips into the same rear straps and buckles used by the top lid so you’re not left with any extra straps or buckles to get in the way. When it’s not needed you can stuff it into the main compartment or into the internal hydration pocket.

While the Exos Pro 55 also has good open storage in the form of side and front pockets, the main compartment is where the bulk of this pack’s capacity is. With over 3350 cubic inches of room, you can put a ton of gear and food inside. Being a mainstream backpack manufacturer, Osprey computes the volume of their packs using industry norms and only counts covered and zippered storage when they calculate backpack volume. If you are comparing the volume of the Exos Pro 55 with a pack from a cottage backpack maker, be aware that they often add in open and closed pocket volumes so the Exos Pro 55 will feel quite a bit larger and hold considerably more gear.

A BV500 bear canister fits horizontally in the Exos Pro 55
A BV500 bear canister fits horizontally in the Exos Pro 55

While the main compartment curves inward to accommodate the shape of the ventilated frame near its base, the main compartment is so large that the pack is still easy to pack. Still, because it is ventilated, you’ll want to position the heaviest items as close to your back and hips as possible. With the exception of a hydration pocket, hang loop, and top compression strap, there’s nothing inside the Exos Pro 55 main compartment like a sleeping bag compartment to break up the seemingly cavernous space. Still, it’s easy to see inside the main compartment because lightly colored fabric panels help channel light to the pack’s interior. I’d still recommend packing the Exos Pro 55 with a pack liner for moisture/rain protection (See Five Ultralight Pack Liners Compared.)

The right hipbelt is large enough to hold a phone and snacks
The right hipbelt pocket is large enough to hold a phone and snacks

Osprey included hipbelt pockets on the Exos Pro 55 but they’re slightly different than those on the current Exos 58. The left-hand pocket is now open on top and doesn’t have a zipper. I thought I’d hate that, but it’s actually pretty useful for stuffing trash into. The right-hand pocket is still zippered and large enough to fit an iPhone X into along with some snack bars.

The left hand hip belt pocket is open on top.
The left-hand hip belt pocket is open on top.

But the pockets are sewn onto the hipbelt in such a way that the back of the pocket has to be able to curve when it wraps around your hips…which is a good way to break a SmartPhone screen. I’d advise against putting anything similarly oversized and inflexible into them.

The Exos Pro 55 has short hip belt wings which is why the pockets are positioned closer to your back.
The Exos Pro 55 has short hip belt wings which is why the pockets are positioned closer to your back.

This is the result of the fact that Osprey keeps the hipbelt wings on the Exos Pro 55 and Exos 58 short, so they wrap around the back and sides of your iliac crest (hipbone) but don’t extend more forward to the front like other backpacks. They still provide effective load-to-hip weight transfer, but I personally prefer longer hipbelts because it means the hipbelt pockets are positioned in front of my torso and not along the sides or back of my hips. You do get used to the shorter hipbelt quickly on the Exos Pro 55 and Exos 58, but it is a different approach to hipbelt length and pocket placement than on backpacks from other manufacturers.

Front opening on the side pockets works best with shorter bottles.
The front opening on the side pockets works best with shorter bottles.

In addition to the main compartment, the Exos Pro 55 has two stretch-side mesh pockets that can be used to store water bottles. The mesh is not strong enough for off-trail travel and I would recommend you stay on trails with this pack in order to keep the pockets from tearing. Each pocket is reinforced with solid fabric on the bottom for better durability and has a holster-style opening cut in front, which lets you position bottles sideways so you can pull them out and replace them when on the move.

The Exos Pro 55 has short hip belt wings which is why the pockets are positioned closer to your back.
Tall bottles are not reachable when wearing the pack.

You can also pack a tall bottle and screwed-on filter in the side pockets, but they aren’t reachable when wearing the pack and tall bottles fall out of the holster pockets if you try to rest them there.

Front open stuff-it pocket is good for carrying rain gear or snacks.
Front open stuff-it pocket is good for carrying rain gear or snacks.

There is also a large stretch stuff-it pocket on the front of the pack which is useful for carrying items that you want easy access to, without requiring that you stop and open your backpack. I can’t live without a stretch pocket like this and use it to stuff light layers or snacks that I want easily accessible during the day. It’s also a good place to stash a wet rainfly, so you can easily pull it out to dry when you stop to admire a view.

Backpack Frame and Suspension

The Exos Pro 55 has an adjustable-length and ventilated frame.
The Exos Pro 55 has an adjustable torso length and ventilated frame.

The Osprey Exos Pro 55 is a ventilated suspended mesh-style backpack. Breathable mesh is suspended in front of the back panel creating a ventilated space behind your back that’s designed to evaporate sweat before it can soak your shirt. The mesh is tightly stretched across the 360-degree aluminum frame which also serves to anchor the hip belt and load lifters. The aluminum frame on the Exos Pro 55 is the secret sauce that “makes” this pack. It’s super lightweight and stiff, providing great load transfer to the hips, so you can load up this pack and still get a very comfortable carry. The carry is actually quite amazing, even with a full load.

The shoulder strap yoke slides up and down a ladder-like track.
The shoulder strap yoke slides up and down a ladder-like track.

This new Exos Pro 55 also has an adjustable torso length with 4″ of adjustability that is very lightweight and simple to use. This is a huge benefit for new backpackers who have less experience sizing and fitting a new backpack. You lengthen or shorten the torso length, the distance between your hip bones and your C7 vertebra, by moving the shoulder strap harness up or down since the position of the hip belt is fixed. This is done using a simple dowel and ladder system which slides up and down along the track on the back of the backpack.

The shoulder straps and hipbelt are both covered with a stretchy mesh fabric that is soft and helps wick moisture to prevent rubbing and chafing. The shoulder straps are lightly padded and have one elastic hydration hose keeper strap on the front. However, while the shoulder straps are comfortable, you’ll be somewhat challenged to attach accessory pockets to them, something that is increasingly popular with backpackers and day hikers alike. The same can be said for the lightly padded hip belt.

The sternum strap is limited to these three positions
The sternum strap is limited to these three positions

Unlike the Exos 58, the sternum strap on the Exos Pro 55 can only be positioned at three locations. To adjust it, you need to push the plastic buckles connecting the sternum strap to the shoulder straps through small cord loops to reposition them higher or lower. It takes a little patience to do this but it’s not difficult and makes for a very secure anchor.

Sizing

The Exos Pro 55 comes in two sizes S/M and L/XL in terms of torso length, while the hip belt length is nearly identical across both sizes (28″-50″ vs 30″-50″), instead of radically different, making it much easier to get a hipbelt that fits you regardless of your torso size.

Osprey Exos Pro 55 Backpack

Comfort
Weight
Suspension
Features
Adjustability
Sizing
Durability

Ultralight Backpack

If you want a large but ultralight (55L) hydration-compatible backpack with a real frame and a top lid, the Exos 55 Pro is a great choice that's designed for multi-day backpacking, thru-hiking, and section hiking.

Shop Now

External Attachment Points and Compression System

The Osprey Exos Pro 55 has two compression straps on each side of the pack. The top strap is anchored on at the top corner of the front stretch pocket and runs to the frame just below the front load lifter, while the bottom strap is configured as a Z crisscrossing over the side water bottle pocket before attaching to the back of the hip belt pocket  I’m not a huge fan of the Z-style threading pattern because I think it makes it difficult to strap bulky gear like snowshoes or a folding pad to the side of a pack. I find two horizontal-side compression straps to be optimal instead.

Osprey removed the sleeping pad straps found on the regular Exos 58
Osprey removed the separate sleeping pad straps found on the regular Exos 58

But one thing that’s missing from Exos Pro 55, but is provided on the Exos 58, is a pair of sleeping bag straps for attaching a folding foam pad, like a NEMO Switchback or a Thermarest Zlite pad to the bottom of the pack below the front stretch pocket. This is very difficult to do with the lower Z-Style side compression straps because they’re not long enough to easily fit over one of these folding pads. You can do it, but it requires a lot of effort and makes it very difficult to put anything into the front stretch pocket because the pad is tightly compressed against the pack. I’d recommend rigging up your own elastic cord loops for attaching a pad to the gear loops running alongside the front stretch pocket instead.

The hipbelt pocket is the anchor for the bottom side compression strap
The hipbelt pocket is the anchor for the bottom side compression strap

You also can’t thread the side compression strap through the side water bottle pocket on the Exos Pro 55 and it can only run on the outside of the mesh pocket. This is because the hipbelt pocket is the anchor for the bottom side compression strap…which is a screwy way to design it because that compression strap will pull the hip belt off your hip if you need to tighten it. These functions are best decoupled.

But don’t let the Z-style straps (which are removable by design) deter you from rigging up two horizontal compression straps instead. One of the great things about the Exos Pro 55 is the distribution of gear loops around the perimeter pockets, the pack bag seams, and even the top lid, making it easy to rig up your own custom compression system with an extra cord lock and some guyline or a piece of webbing. If I used the Exos Pro 55 regularly, I’d probably remove the side compression straps off and replace them with my own cord and cordlocks.

Likes

  • Lightweight and high-capacity (55 L)
  • Dynamic frame that makes loads feel lighter
  • Large bear canister fits horizontally
  • A lightweight perimeter frame provides great load transfer and control
  • Lightly colored fabric strips improve main compartment visibility
  • Lots of external attachment points all around the pack

Dislikes

  • Difficult to attach accessory pockets to the shoulder straps or hipbelt pockets.
  • Difficult to pull tall items out of side pockets while wearing the pack.
  • Z-style side compression straps are awkward to use with bulky gear.
  • No sleeping pad straps.

Comparable Ventilated (Suspended Mesh) Backpacks

There aren’t many lightweight (sub 3 pound) ventilated backpacks available today, with or without adjustable torso lengths.

Make / ModelWeightAdjustable Torso Length
Osprey Exos 582 lbs 13 oz / 1276gYes
Osprey Exos Pro 552 lb 1.2 oz / 941gYes
Gregory Focal 582 lbs 9.3 oz / 1171gNo
Zpacks Arc Blast 551 lb 3.9 oz / 565gYes
Zpacks Arc Haul Ultra 601 lb 3.6 oz / 556gYes

Zpacks also has several models that are very competitive with the Exos Pro 55 including the Zpacks Blast 55 (See our Zpacks Blast 55 Review) and the Zpacks Arc Haul Ultra 60 (See our Zpacks Arc Haul Ultra 60 Review.) While both of these packs are much lighter than the Exos Pro 55, they’re also much more expensive. On the other hand, if you want a ventilated backpack with an adjustable torso length that’s set up like an ultralight roll-top pack, they’re the only game in town.

The Exos Pro 55 can hold a full backpacking load plus 4-5 days of food.
The Exos Pro 55 can hold a full backpacking load plus 4-5 days of food.

Recommendation

The Osprey Packs Exos Pro 55 Backpack is a top-loading backpack with an adjustable torso length that’s easy to fit and configure for many different kinds of hiking and backpacking trips. Weighing just 2 pounds 1.2 ounces, it boasts a reinforced perimeter-style aluminum frame and ventilated suspension that provides excellent comfort and control for loads up to 30 pounds. If you want a large but ultralight (55L) hydration-compatible backpack with a real frame and a top lid, the Exos 55 Pro is a great choice that’s designed for multi-day backpacking, thru-hiking, and section hiking.

The thing that I like less about this pack is the way it forces you to pack a certain way when it comes to carrying water bottles, adding accessory pockets, or strapping gear to the outside of the backpack. I prefer more flexibility in this regard, but that’s my personal preference. Despite that, I could see being perfectly happy using an Exos Pro 55 for a long-distance or section-hiking backpacking trip, particularly in hot and humid weather where a ventilated suspended mesh frame is a huge win.

Disclosure: The author owns this backpack.

SectionHiker is reader-supported. We only make money if you purchase a product through our affiliate links. Help us continue to test and write unsponsored and independent gear reviews, beginner FAQs, and free hiking guides.

38 comments

  1. I notice that the Levity packs are no longer on the Osprey website and assume they’ve been discontinued (probably too much of a niche pack to generate good sales.) Is the Pro 55 intended to be a replacement for the Levity, sort-of-ly?

  2. Do you like this frame better than the flexible spring steel frame on the Levity ?

  3. I really can’t remember what the Levity frame was like. But I do like the one on the Levity Pro 55 quite a bit. It’s lively but has a center stiffener which keeps it from being bouncy and protects your back from a bear canister poking through.

  4. I’d really like to see the mainstream backpack companies start offering options with water proof material. From what I’ve read about “Ultra”, it doesn’t seem like it would add that much to the cost.

    • The value of Ultra is its abrasion resistance, actually. Unless you also seam tape, using a fabric just because it’s waterproof doesn’t buy you much since water will still leak in and make your stuff all wet.

  5. Phil, as always, thanks for the detailed review. The weight reduction and adjustable harness are definitely a plus for me (I could never get the “red” older Exos to feel good on my back.)
    However, bummed they removed the hiking pole straps and the ability to grab the larger water bottles from the sides. I guess I’ll clunk along with my Atmos 65 for a bit.
    If I may repeat myself, your level of detail in this review is phenomenal.
    With much gratitude,
    Three Speed

  6. Thanks for the great review, very detailed… Would you say that this is roomy enough for overnight winter hikes?

  7. As I said in your earlier comparison article on UL framed backpacks, as a geezer I could stand losing over 11 oz. compared to my current EXOS 58. This pack is calling my name and I’m heading to my local REI store right now to try it on.

  8. Looks like a great pack.

    It’s crazy how much backpacking has changed in the last 10 years. I remember when it seemed like it was hard to find a pack below 4# in REI. Now, a 2# pack that is made by a major company and is sold in REI, crazy!

  9. Philip,
    Thanks for the review. Really good info. I’m planning a JMT hike. Was looking at Exos 58. But now really intrigued by the Exos 55 Pro. I’m fine with giving up a few features and would like the weight savings. Just wondering about carrying load. Think my weight will be mostly in the 20s, which sounds like either can handle. But it probably will get up to about 35 after a full resupply. Is there a difference at that point? Looks like the Osprey specs suggest there is (35 pounds max for the Exos 58 and 30 for the 55 Pro?) … You’ve used them. Can you tell a difference in that aspect? Or is the difference mostly in durability and features? Thanks!

  10. Mark, I’ll be curious to hear what you decide. I’m in the same boat—expect to carry in the low/mid-30s, my typical load—and have loved the old version (10 year old version) of the Exos 58. But I like the design, weight, and feature set of the new Exos Pro 55. Last year I made the mistake of carrying a much heavier load (45-48 lbs) on the first half of the JMT, with the Osprey Kestrel 58 (actually a great pack, just heavy and enabled me to carry too much) and it was absolutely miserable. This year, for the second half, cutting weight where I can to get back to low 30s, and am hoping the Exos Pro 55 will be able to carry up to 35 lb. If you do decide on the Exos Pro 55, hope you’ll write an update!

    Philip: thank you so much for all your tremendous reviews, including this one. I’ve bought—and avoided—a lot of equipment because of your advice.

  11. I’ve just bought the Eja Pro 55 (women’s version of the Exos). I already have an Eja 48 but was trying to get lighter. Your review is spot on but I’d like to add that the lengthening/shortening straps on the shoulders of the women’s version have ‘buckles’ that sit in completely the wrong place for arm movement and rub badly on the inside of your arms. I’ve tried everything to get them sitting in a different place but no luck. I’m considering sending the pack back because of this.

    • Wanda is working on a review of the Eja Pro 55 right now. She’s a wiz at gear mods so I’ll ask her what she thinks.

    • Hi Margaret,
      I put in some good miles on an Eja Pro today and made a point of testing for your issue. I was able to duplicate your problem by rolling up my sleeves. Bare skin does not do well against the buckles/bottom part of the shoulder strap. I don’t know if this will help you but I did not have a problem with my usual style of short sleeve T-shirt. This is a problem I’ve occasionally had with other packs, so I always make sure I buy short sleeve shirts with decent length sleeves. I don’t do tank tops or shirts with cap sleeves for this reason. The problem is the padded part of the strap is just not as long as it should be. I don’t think there is anything that could be done other than perhaps making a small lycra sleeve to go over that part of the strap.

  12. Hi Philip, thanks for the review.

    Do you know if the Exos Pro 55, or even the 2022 Exos 58, have more or less hip flex than the 2018 Exos 58?

    I have a 2018 Exos 58 Medium (without hip pockets), the hip belt doesn’t have much torsional flex, so going up large vertical steps causes some alternating asymmetric loading on the hips for me.

    Do you know what is the internal frame height of the Exos Pro 55 S/M and Eja Pro 55 M/L (Wanda’s?), and if they’re the same as the 2022 Exos / Eja?

    My 2018 Exos 58 size M is 61.5cm internal frame height while the S was around 57cm. The S shoulder/hips were too short, while the M is too tall, so the back of my head knocks on the top of the frame. I also can’t take the M as carryon in airplanes when only filled to the top of the frame, as the carryon limit is typically 55cm (21.7 inches).

    The newer men’s S/M and women’s M/L are spec’d for 3cm shorter back lengths than the older men’s M. I was hoping that these newer models would reduce either of these 2 problems.

    Otherwise I was thinking of the Mariposa 60, but I don’t know if the lumbar pad would work for me, as I need it to curve in 2 planes, otherwise flattish vertical pads will slip down my butt. The 2018 Exos wrapped around my lumbar/hip perfectly without slipping due to the trampoline tension. I also prefer keeping more things internally than externally, and my back tends to get hot.

    Does the thinner shoulder padding on the Exos Pro 55 decrease the comfort compared to the Exos 58?

    • Sorry, I don’t have the old model and the new model around to compare. As for the thinner padding on the Exos Pro 55, it’s just as comfortable, but again I have most of the weight on my hips.

      • I was able to check in a store the Exos 55 pro SM, 2022 Exos 38 SM, and 2022 Eja 38 XSS and ML. I suspect that there is no difference in the frame and harness sizing between 58, 48, 38, because the Exos pro 55 SM and Exos 38 SM have the same frame height of 60cm and width of 37-38cm, and same shoulder strap and hip belt lengths, but I can’t be sure.

        Compared to the old 2018 Exos 58 M which has a taller frame at 61.5-62cm and wider at 41cm, it seems like the Pro and 2022 models could be slightly more comfortable on the hips with more flexibility, but the store only loaded the packs to around 6kg, so I can’t be sure.

        Comparing the Exos 55 Pro SM and 2022 Exos 38 SM, the thinner shoulder straps on the Pro does put a little more point pressure on me along the out edges of the straps. The folded over double layered shoulder padding on the regular Exos was a little more comfortable, if it was adjusted to be located over the area of the shoulder with the most pressure.

        The cylindrical dowel on the Pro that goes through the holes in the harness ladder tends to fall out of the hole every time I put down the backpack, while the square buckle that the regular 2022 Exos uses stays in place.

        The hip padding on the Pro has a large cutout that goes over the iliac crest, while on the regular 2022 Exos the padding covers the entire iliac crest with uniform thickness. I could not tell which was more comfortable due to the store only loading the packs to around 6kg.

        The silly Z-compression strap buckles that attach to the hip pockets has less of an effect on the regular 2022 Exos due to the strap passing through a double ring friction lock halfway through the Z, but the Pro has 2 separate straps on each side which is more convenient and adjustable. A solution would to be to pull out the strap from the bottom buckle and knot the end of the strap so that it can’t pass through the first ring, or double loop the strap through the double friction ring so that it acts like an adjustable buckle.

        The air gap on the Pro is shallower than on the regular 2022 Exos, so the Pro has a closer center of gravity. The Pro trampoline doesn’t have much tension, so bending over will cause the spine to contact the main compartment. While the trampoline on the regular Exos has a lot of tension and will support / form to the spine when bending over, and maintain an air gap to the main compartment for more cooling and possibly better comfort. Both the Pro and regular 2022 Exos have a horizontal spar that connects both sides of the frame at around the midpoint, but the Pro is external while the regular 2022 Exos is internal, and the regular 2022 Exos horizontal spar is more pronounced due to the greater arching of the frame, which would affect packing a bit more. The trampoline mesh on the Pro has smaller holes.

        The 2018 Exos and regular 2022 Exos both appear to have similar sized air gaps.

        The men’s SM and women’s ML appear to have the same exact frame, shoulder strap length and belt length. The only difference by gender appears to be the shape of the shoulder strap, with the lower end of the women’s strap angling outwards. There may possibly be differences at the yoke and neck, but I did not pay attention.

        The women’s 2022 Eja 38 XXS is 55cm frame height and 2 tabs shorter on the ladder, and each tab is 2.5cm apart, resulting in the 5cm difference from the 60cm women’s 2022 ML. And I assume this also applies to the Exos Pro 55 SM / Exos 58 SM / Eja Pro 55 ML / Eja 58 ML (all 2022).

        With my 46-47cm back length, the top of the women’s 2022 XSS frame was exactly level with the top of my shoulders and using the top hole in the ladder was still too short for me, while the women’s ML and men’s SM frame protrude 5cm above my shoulders, and I was using the second to the top hole in the ladder, which is around 2cm higher than the top hole in the XXS ladder.

        Therefore, the Men’s SM and Women’s ML spec’d at around 50cm maximum back length appears to be correct, or just barely enough.

        The Women’s XXS shoulder straps compared to the Women’s ML / Men’s SM was 2cm shorter length from the dowel to the start of the double layer padding, 2cm shorter length of double layer padding, and 1cm shorter at the end of strap, for a total of 5cm shorter length.

        The Women’s XXS hip belt padding compared to the Women’s ML / Men’s SM was 3cm shorter length on each wing, and 1cm closer together on the trampoline, for a total of 7cm shorter length. On my 97-100cm waist + clothing, the XXS hip padding reached the tips of my iliac crest, while the Women’s ML / Men’s SM hip padding wrapped to the front of my iliac crest. I am unable to say which was more comfortable due to low loading.

        If you want to fill the pack to the top of the frame, then the Women’s XXS frame at 55cm would pass for carry-on baggage. While the 60cm Women’s ML, and Men’s SM would have to be filled only at the bottom 1/3rd and then tilted diagonally. You could possibly fill the brain too and unbuckle the clips and flip the brain to the trampoline side while the frame is tilted diagonally. Going by the most restrictive main carrier, a carry-on limit of 55x40x20cm, the diagonal is sqrt(55×55+20×20) = 58.5cm, which may or may not pass the gate agent. The next most restrictive of 55x40x23cm, the diagonal is 59.6cm, which may just barely pass.

        An idea to be carry-on compliant would be to take the Women’s XXS pack, and use a Men’s SM shoulder strap, and optionally altering the buckle strap that goes through the hole in the ladder, to make the strap 2cm longer. The only problems for me may be the short belt padding, and the load lifters / top of frame being horizontally parallel with the top of my shoulders.

        • Brilliant comparison. Do you want a job?

        • I want to go long term traveling, so probably no jobs for now. I usually have only 1 backpack for a decade, so it’s like buying a house to live in, and I want to make sure the backpack fits me well.

          I think the reason why the new 2022 Exos/Eja and 2023 Pro might seem more comfortable at the hips than the older 2018 model is that the hip padding fins are spaced closer together by several centimeters on the 2022/2023 models, so that any gaps around zone between the hips and the lumbar have been greatly reduced for a closer fit.

          There’s still not much flexibility with Osprey’s hips on their trampoline designs, and it’s slightly troubling for my mobility. I also had the chance to look at Deuter models. Deuter Futura trampolines have extremely comfortable and close fitting hips that allow you to twist and turn however you want, but these packs start at 2kg and 60cm tall frames for women’s or even taller for men’s.

          Deuter Aircontact Lite hips are also quite comfortable and flexible, but with direct contact back padding, although starts at 1.5kg, and women’s frames start at 53cm, while the top of the frame is still 2cm above my shoulders (perfect for airplane), and men’s start at 58cm.

  13. Thanks for the great write-up! Right now I’m deciding between this pack and the Gossamer Gear Silverback 65. Any recommendations?

    I have a heavy duty 65L pack already (Fjällraven Abisko, discontinued line). But I wanna try packing lighter, though the volume of my gear is still quite big (Hilleberg tent and winter sleeping bag).

    I guess the idea is to get a backpack which is perfect for carrying lighter, yet more volominous loads and use the other Fjällraven pack for heavier loads (> 15 kg).

    Would it make more sense to get this one or the Gossamer Gear in that regard? Or does this make sense at all?

    Any tips would be appreciated.

  14. Did a long hike in the Smokys last year with the 58 and ultimately returned the pack due to rubbing issues on my tailbone (I’ve heard it’s a complaint amongst others as well with that pack). Concerned this pack wild rub the same. I’m 5’5” btw. That pack did everything right and it looks like this 55 pro would as well. I wanted to keep that pack so bad. If the pro would eliminate the rubbing I’d seriously consider buying! Thanks for the review.

  15. Ron Stokley (Pilgrim)

    I had the same experience on the Pro 55 that Flat Back did, i.e. “The cylindrical dowel on the Pro that goes through the holes in the harness ladder tends to fall out of the hole every time I put down the backpack, while the square buckle that the regular 2022 Exos uses stays in place.”
    I called Osprey Customer Service and told them I have owned many of their packs, most recently an EXOS 58 to compare the 55 with. I was told “there was nothing they could do”. I returned the pack. There must be someone at Osprey to listen to customers.

  16. Ron Stokley (Pilgrim)

    You offer a good work-around but you missed my point. Two people, of all your followers, and at least one REI reviewer I read, noted the same issue. I had hoped Osprey would want this feedback to correct the issue on future model updates; not say “there’s nothing to be done”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *